Hey, this is a question for CIMA and LoveJohnny and anybody else that uses skinny skis... I sometimes use my Glittertind at the resort... A couple of times, I noticed that too much leaning and angulation makes the ski slip sideways... Probably 2 reasons for this: —the binding, a Voile 3 pin, «overfl...

CIMA wrote:One of xcD experts of who I know seem to like NNN system more.

Who is it? Telehiro? HiyokoD?

lowangle al wrote: I'm just reluctant to put a binding with a 3 hole pattern on an expensive ski and risk ripping it out. Maybe this new binding with the riser is a four hole pattern.

2 solutions: epoxy and/or inserts... Unless you weight 600 pounds...

That's terrible news! I hope it's not true... First they change their bindings to not work with thin bill xc shoes... now they threaten to stop making pins! What is this world coming to?!? Nah! Quite the contrary actually... They redesigned a tried and true binding. In my book, it is good for XCD.....

Félicitations! Maintenant, on comprendra si on te voit quelque peu cerné...

New from Voile... It probably tells something interesting about the development of XCD...
http://www.voile.com/voile-telemark-bin ... nding.html

That's exactly what I meant, Marius... But you will see that around here; sellers that need to find a new opening, a new market... by selling 100 mm waist «all around» skis. Hilarious indeed!

Pretty good! I'd like to be a kid like that... bouncing around, jumping, skiing as if there were no tomorrow...

I see a lot of guys on the slopes when it is icy with 90-100 mm waist skis... I understood when I did a little shopping; the sellers are offering wide skis as an «all around, all mountain skis»... What one doesn't know is that it is much harder on the knees on hardpack... The new trend correspond to...

Glittertind on the groomed... Some say it ain't skiable... No way Jose! Will mount mine with risers because I tend to skid when the 3 pin binding sides hit the slope...