Thinner 75mm boot soles?
- bgregoire
- Posts: 1511
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
- Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
- Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
- Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar
Thinner 75mm boot soles?
I am hearing reports some of the new 2018-2019 boots, specifically the Alpina Alaska, are popping up with thinner Vibram duckbills. 15mm instead of 18mm. Can anyone here confirm? Is this also the case for other brands and models this year?
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
I think the Alaska 75's have been at 15mm for at least a few years now. I just put the calipers on mine and they are 15mm. The boots were made in 5/2016 according to the tag.bgregoire wrote:I am hearing reports some of the new 2018-2019 boots, specifically the Alpina Alaska, are popping up with thinner Vibram duckbills. 15mm instead of 18mm. Can anyone here confirm? Is this also the case for other brands and models this year?
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
I can confirm that the first-generation Alaska 75 had a 15mm duckbill.
I cannot speak for the current model Alaska 75- though I did examine it briefly and it definitely had a stiffer sole-flex than the first-gen, with its super floppy sole.
I cannot speak for the current model Alaska 75- though I did examine it briefly and it definitely had a stiffer sole-flex than the first-gen, with its super floppy sole.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
- phoenix
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 5:44 pm
- Location: Northern VT
- Ski style: My own
- Favorite Skis: Varies,I've had many favorites
- Favorite boots: Excursions, T1's
- Occupation: I'm occupied
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
My Alaska's are maybe 2 years old, I'll measure them when I'm home later... but I know they're thinner than an Excursion or T3, T4, etc sole.
- bgregoire
- Posts: 1511
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
- Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
- Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
- Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
Well I was not aware the Alaska duckbills have been thin (15mm) since their beginning. Anyone with other brand/model boots purchased in the last couple years care to give me their duckbill widths?
I'm curious if all boots of a given year have the same vibram sole or if that can vary from model to model...
I'm curious if all boots of a given year have the same vibram sole or if that can vary from model to model...
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM
- phoenix
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 5:44 pm
- Location: Northern VT
- Ski style: My own
- Favorite Skis: Varies,I've had many favorites
- Favorite boots: Excursions, T1's
- Occupation: I'm occupied
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
Just measured mine: 16.07mm duckbill, Vibram sole. My excursions are a little over 18mm.
- Tom M
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:01 pm
- Location: Northwest Wyoming USA
- Ski style: Skate on Groomed, XCD Off, Backcountry Tele
- Favorite Skis: Fischer S-Bound 98 Off Trail, Voile V6 BC for Tele
- Favorite boots: Currently skiing Alfa Vista, Alfa Free, Scarpa T2
- Occupation: Retired
- Website: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCam0VG ... shelf_id=1
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
The duckbill on my Fischer BCX 675's (2017 Version) is 17 mm.
The duckbill on my Rossignol BC X-12's (just purchased) is 17.5 mm
The duckbill on my Rossignol BC X-12's (just purchased) is 17.5 mm
- bgregoire
- Posts: 1511
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
- Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
- Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
- Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
Thanks for your answers! I've come to the following conclusions about these thermomolded vibram soles
1) I was surely wrong about the shrinkening thickness of the Alpina Alaska duckbill, seems they were actually thin on along.
https://www.telemarktalk.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=218
2)To my great surprise, it appears Vibram offers different duckbill thicknesses and perhaps other variables as well to the different boot manufacturers in a given year!?!
Apparently, the new Voile Mountaineer and Voile 3-pin cables are designed to take a minimum of 16mm (up to 20) whereas the Rottefella Super Tele can go down to 13mm.
So, the ST should be a better binding for the Alaska....
I've just been thinking, why doesnt Alpina use a thicker duckbill sole?
1) I was surely wrong about the shrinkening thickness of the Alpina Alaska duckbill, seems they were actually thin on along.
https://www.telemarktalk.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=218
2)To my great surprise, it appears Vibram offers different duckbill thicknesses and perhaps other variables as well to the different boot manufacturers in a given year!?!
Apparently, the new Voile Mountaineer and Voile 3-pin cables are designed to take a minimum of 16mm (up to 20) whereas the Rottefella Super Tele can go down to 13mm.
So, the ST should be a better binding for the Alaska....
I've just been thinking, why doesnt Alpina use a thicker duckbill sole?
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM
- Leo Tasker
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2018 3:50 am
- Location: Oslo, Norway
- Ski style: Uncoordinated but enthustiastic
- Favorite Skis: Åsnes Gamme
- Favorite boots: Alfa Skarvet
- Occupation: Top Gun Bootfitter
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
I wonder if a thinner sole flexes more easily, and is therefore less prone to cracking than a thicker, stiffer one? Might be one reason for boot makers to switch, even if it makes the boot less powerful for downhill skiing...
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: Thinner 75mm boot soles?
I'm resurrecting this topic.
I just bought two pairs of Alaska 75mm, because they fit my feet so well. I have to get my calipers, but off my metric square ruler, my wife's are at 15mm and mine are 14mm.
I was under the impression that Alpina beefed up the duckbill a few years ago and went thicker, for instance my friend bought a pair of Alaska's for last winter in 2018 and they are at 17.5mm (w/ calipers). His pair with the thicker bill is what convinced me to go get my own pair.
Mine have a 03/19 sticker on the sole.
DISAPPOINTED. Variability in year-to-year? Variability in pairs?
I just bought two pairs of Alaska 75mm, because they fit my feet so well. I have to get my calipers, but off my metric square ruler, my wife's are at 15mm and mine are 14mm.
I was under the impression that Alpina beefed up the duckbill a few years ago and went thicker, for instance my friend bought a pair of Alaska's for last winter in 2018 and they are at 17.5mm (w/ calipers). His pair with the thicker bill is what convinced me to go get my own pair.
Mine have a 03/19 sticker on the sole.
DISAPPOINTED. Variability in year-to-year? Variability in pairs?