Page 3 of 3

Re: Spring skiing voyaging... which ski to bring?

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:33 pm
by lilcliffy
Oh- yeah I was aware of both models- was wondering whether you are considering getting the waxable based Objective?

Re: Spring skiing voyaging... which ski to bring?

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:58 pm
by Woodserson
Yes. I wish it had skinlock, this would be a no brainer.

Re: Spring skiing voyaging... which ski to bring?

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:10 pm
by Harris
Since you are skiing with an alpiner, keep it simple; you aren't building a nuke here: use the all mountain ski you ski downhill best on, forget the fish scale base skis and throw the skins on when your buddy does. I mean you and your bud are basically getting from one downhill experience to the other together. For a sleeper advantage keep some smear-on Dominator Butter high fluro wax in your pack, with a cork. That will help you hang with him when it counts, avoiding as best you can the snow gremlins that reach from under, grab, and cause us telemarkers to face plant in wetter snow.

Re: Spring skiing voyaging... which ski to bring?

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:34 pm
by fisheater
Woods, I agree completely in regards to preferring to have skinlock. The other thing that I greatly prefer in the Tind is the much larger turning radius of 22 meters vs 19.5 meters for the Objective. While in a lift served ski I wouldn't think twice, in a touring ski I am leary of wandering ski syndrome on the flats. It is one thing I do not appreciate about the S-112.
I also would prefer a 187 Tind to a 178 Objective.
Good luck Woods, figuring what ski to bring on a ski vacation to the French Alps is a good problem to have!

Re: Spring skiing voyaging... which ski to bring?

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:33 am
by lilcliffy
Harris wrote:Since you are skiing with an alpiner, keep it simple; you aren't building a nuke here: use the all mountain ski you ski downhill best on, forget the fish scale base skis and throw the skins on when your buddy does. I mean you and your bud are basically getting from one downhill experience to the other together. For a sleeper advantage keep some smear-on Dominator Butter high fluro wax in your pack, with a cork. That will help you hang with him when it counts, avoiding as best you can the snow gremlins that reach from under, grab, and cause us telemarkers to face plant in wetter snow.

Very best.
Those snow gremlins are all too real!

Re: Spring skiing voyaging... which ski to bring?

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:44 am
by lilcliffy
fisheater wrote:Woods, I agree completely in regards to preferring to have skinlock. The other thing that I greatly prefer in the Tind is the much larger turning radius of 22 meters vs 19.5 meters for the Objective. While in a lift served ski I wouldn't think twice, in a touring ski I am leary of wandering ski syndrome on the flats. It is one thing I do not appreciate about the S-112.
I also would prefer a 187 Tind to a 178 Objective.
Good luck Woods, figuring what ski to bring on a ski vacation to the French Alps is a good problem to have!

Here you regarding the wandering squirrely syndrome- hate it in fact.
What about camber profile though?
That Tind looks quite banna-ish on the Asnes website:
https://www.en.asnes.com/produkt/asnes- ... komstfell/
Not a fully-rockered banana- but definitely appears to have less camber than the Objective, and definitely has an open tail compared to the Objective:
https://www.en.asnes.com/produkt/asnes- ... komstfell/

The Tind's profile looks more narrowly tuned towards deep soft snow- the Objective's profile looks more versatile- my prediction would be better edge hold on the Objective.

And as far as the wandering XC ski- skis with extreme sidecut certainly want to turn, even when XC skiing- but my experience is that skis that do not have camber (e.g. Tind) will not track at all on a firm base- they feel dead and smeary.