Scales vs. Kicker-Skins
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 5:32 pm
So- my Koms let me down this week.
I had the morning free- got up very early to do chores- hit a local steep open field just after dawn.
It was almost 10C the afternoon before- went down to -12C overnight.
South-facing slope- 30-45%.
About 75 metres vertical.
Over a metre of dense consolidated spring snow.
Started out with my 162cm Kom and T4 boot + 3-pin hardwire.
I could not get any grip with the scaled Kom- I mean none.
I could not lay a track at much more than 5% slope- and, even at 5% I was sliding backwards- constantly.
Did two laps and gave up.
Went back and got my 188cm Storetind with 60mm Skin-Lock kicker skins (mohair). Same boot- same binding.
With the ST and Skin-Lock I was able to climb straight up the slope with very little effort- even raised the climbing wires.
Although I had to take the skins off at the top- I did WAAY more laps per hour with WAAY less effort.
I now clearly understand the idea of the integrated Easy-Skin kicker skins over the scales on Fischer's S-Bounds. Whether the scaled or smooth base is better I think entirely depends on one's local climate and typical snow conditions.
My current thinking is that grip wax + kicker skin is better than scales + kicker skin- at least for my typical snow and climate...Next winter- with more time to ski both of these skis- I may be able to come to a conclusion...
No matter what- despite having to take the skin off before a run- if I had to have one BC XCD ski for my local skiing- it would be a smooth waxable base + kicker-skin.
.....................................
In general, I love scaled skis for low-vertical touring for turns and yo-yo skiing- no need to take off skins at the top of the hill before a downhill run! (Grip wax offers the same efficiency when the conditions are right.)
Kicker-skins offer WAAAY more efficient climbing traction than scales- though you do have to take them off at the top for any serious downhill skiing...
When it comes to the XC part of XCD skiing- I have fallen in love with my 60mm mohair Skin-Lock kicker skins. I easily get as much glide on my 188cm Storetind + kicker-skin, as I do on my 162cm scaled Kom...Though this is not really a fair comparison- the flex, camber and length-profile of the ST offers better XC performance than the Kom in the first place...(This depends on snow/temperature conditions. When the snow is very cold the kicker skins do produce a lot of drag- but, I use grip/kick wax on that snow anyway.)
As for the more distance-oriented- that dominates my local touring- I am using kicker skins more and more- waxless scales less and less...
And although last spring I got over my backcountry aversion to klister- I am finding that Easy-Skins/Skin-Locks make klister unnecessary for touring.
I had the morning free- got up very early to do chores- hit a local steep open field just after dawn.
It was almost 10C the afternoon before- went down to -12C overnight.
South-facing slope- 30-45%.
About 75 metres vertical.
Over a metre of dense consolidated spring snow.
Started out with my 162cm Kom and T4 boot + 3-pin hardwire.
I could not get any grip with the scaled Kom- I mean none.
I could not lay a track at much more than 5% slope- and, even at 5% I was sliding backwards- constantly.
Did two laps and gave up.
Went back and got my 188cm Storetind with 60mm Skin-Lock kicker skins (mohair). Same boot- same binding.
With the ST and Skin-Lock I was able to climb straight up the slope with very little effort- even raised the climbing wires.
Although I had to take the skins off at the top- I did WAAY more laps per hour with WAAY less effort.
I now clearly understand the idea of the integrated Easy-Skin kicker skins over the scales on Fischer's S-Bounds. Whether the scaled or smooth base is better I think entirely depends on one's local climate and typical snow conditions.
My current thinking is that grip wax + kicker skin is better than scales + kicker skin- at least for my typical snow and climate...Next winter- with more time to ski both of these skis- I may be able to come to a conclusion...
No matter what- despite having to take the skin off before a run- if I had to have one BC XCD ski for my local skiing- it would be a smooth waxable base + kicker-skin.
.....................................
In general, I love scaled skis for low-vertical touring for turns and yo-yo skiing- no need to take off skins at the top of the hill before a downhill run! (Grip wax offers the same efficiency when the conditions are right.)
Kicker-skins offer WAAAY more efficient climbing traction than scales- though you do have to take them off at the top for any serious downhill skiing...
When it comes to the XC part of XCD skiing- I have fallen in love with my 60mm mohair Skin-Lock kicker skins. I easily get as much glide on my 188cm Storetind + kicker-skin, as I do on my 162cm scaled Kom...Though this is not really a fair comparison- the flex, camber and length-profile of the ST offers better XC performance than the Kom in the first place...(This depends on snow/temperature conditions. When the snow is very cold the kicker skins do produce a lot of drag- but, I use grip/kick wax on that snow anyway.)
As for the more distance-oriented- that dominates my local touring- I am using kicker skins more and more- waxless scales less and less...
And although last spring I got over my backcountry aversion to klister- I am finding that Easy-Skins/Skin-Locks make klister unnecessary for touring.