paulzo wrote:Ingstad at 84/62/74 might be too close to my current skis (Atomic Rainier, 88/60/78) to be worth it - although that is less sidecut.
Having skied the Rainer (=Rebound) many times over the years- I can confirm that the Ingstad BC is a very different ski.
The Ingstad BC is softer and less cambered underfoot than the Rainier/Rebound.
The Ingstad BC has loads of tip rocker- the Rainier/Rebound has none. The Rainier/Rebound has a much longer glide zone than the Ingstad BC on dense/consolidated snow.
But the Ingstad BC is much better in deep, soft snow, and offers wonderous downhill performance compared to the Rainier/Rebound.