2015 Fischer E-109 Tour Easy-Skin

Real reviews by real skiers. What a concept! Add your own today. Reviews only please, questions can be posted as replies but new threads looking for opinions should be posted to the main Telemark Talk Forum.
User avatar
lilcliffy

Rank: XCD KNIGHT
XCD KNIGHT
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada

Re: 2015 Fischer E-109 Tour Easy-Skin

Postby lilcliffy » Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:48 pm

These skis make beautiful LONG-radius carves turns, and the sidecut definitely contributes to that. But, when I say LONG-radius- I mean it. Nothing feels better than riding skis on edge- not forcing them- as long as you got the room to do so!

The other thing about the telemark- that isn't spoken about much these days- is the physics of the two offset skis producing the effect of one long ski with deep sidecut. I find the physics of this MUCH more effective on deep, soft snow. On a dense base- I find that the two skis behave like two separate skis- telemark or not.
The pursuit of XCD balance: cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry

User avatar
MikeK

Rank: XCD KNIGHT
XCD KNIGHT
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:12 pm

Re: 2015 Fischer E-109 Tour Easy-Skin

Postby MikeK » Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:06 pm

Yeah - it's probably like a 50M radius ski. They'll carve shorter than that if they can flex well, but a shorter radius ski will do it much better.

On say a small dh run where I can squeak out 4 or 5 tight turns on my S 98s, I can only do maybe two on my S78s. It's about what you would expect comparing their radius and flex.

User avatar
lilcliffy

Rank: XCD KNIGHT
XCD KNIGHT
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada

Re: 2015 Fischer E-109 Tour Easy-Skin

Postby lilcliffy » Mon Dec 26, 2016 5:36 pm

Some more observations on this ski:

1) The low profile tip on this ski is very poor. The Nordic rocker opens up beautifully- but, it only does so much when breaking trail through deep, fresh snow. I don't even need to try the Ingstad/Combat Nato to know that it is going to be better at breaking trail.

2) The flex pattern of this ski is what makes it a better XCD ski than a stiffer and more cambered ski like the E-99. The camber is lower and softer on the E-109. The E-109 climbs better, and it is easier to turn- the camber is easier to control. I would still describe the E-109 as a double-cambered xcountry ski though. The E-109 is a BC-XC ski for hilly terrain. The E-99 is more finely tuned for the gentle to rolling terrain.

3) The integrated Easy-Skin is well designed, seamless and performs very well. You need the full 50mm for difficult icy, refrozen snow. The 35mm might be enough for warm, wet snow- not sure if it is better than the scaled-base E-109 Crown- but it might eliminate the need for owning a waxless-scaled ski.
The pursuit of XCD balance: cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry

User avatar
lilcliffy

Rank: XCD KNIGHT
XCD KNIGHT
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada

Re: 2015 Fischer E-109 Tour Easy-Skin

Postby lilcliffy » Tue Apr 04, 2017 3:50 pm

I must say that I love this ski.

When the conditions are ideal for the flex pattern of this ski- with that soft open tip- this ski is an absolute high-performance XCD dream!

Then there are all the conditions that are not ideal: very deep snow; breakable crust.

This ski is the result of the evolution of trying to make a ski good at everything. It feels like each component of this ski has been designed in isolation. But a skis' performance is a complex result of all of its characteristics.

And when the conditions are ideal, this ski is, in fact, good at everything.

But- as we all know- in the backcountry the conditions are not always ideal.

Here are the two fundamental problems with this ski:
1) It has so much sidecut that its potential flotation is lost- it offer no more effective float than its narrower brother the E-99.

2) The tip is almost ridiculously soft compared to the rest of the ski. Combined with the Nordic-rockered tip- when the conditions are less than ideal, that tip rises up and flips and flaps around leaving the rest of the ski behind and below.

The camber and flex pattern of this ski are perfectly designed for distance-oriented BC-XD touring in hilly terrain. It offers true kick and glide snap plus a flex that is easy to control when climbing and turning.

The complex of the very soft rockered tip and very narrow waist is what causes this ski to fail. This not a "D" problem- it is a "XC" problem.

My problem is that this ski masquerades as a deep, soft snow BC-XC ski- and this is precisely where it fails.

I must say that the E-99 Tour Easy-Skin is better than this ski.

And this ski certainly falls way behind the Asnes Combat Nato when I consider overall performance.
The pursuit of XCD balance: cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry

Cannatonic

Rank: XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 10:07 pm

Re: 2015 Fischer E-109 Tour Easy-Skin

Postby Cannatonic » Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:16 pm

The length of these skis affects how they work too - if you want an E99 that climbs well, the 205cm would do better than 210, and the 200cm even better.

I know because a few years ago I bought a lot of 2010ish E99's through ebay in 200, 205, and 210 and skied them all! My weight crushed the camber flat after a couple dozen trips on the 200's, they climbed extremely well and turned easily. The 210 excel at flotation and glide, the 205 glide a little slower but act more tele-like.

agree on the utility of integrated kicker skins, I'm so impressed by the Asnes system I may have bought my last pair of fishscale skis. The Asnes skins are disposable, with the clips you can replace or remake the skin anytime you want.


Return to “Community Ski Reviews”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests