Falketind 62 Review

Real reviews by real skiers. What a concept! Add your own today. Reviews only please, questions can be posted as replies but new threads looking for opinions should be posted to the main Telemark Talk Forum.
User avatar
fisheater

Rank: XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:06 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI

Falketind 62 Review

Postby fisheater » Sun Feb 04, 2018 3:09 pm

The ski is a Falketind 62, 188 cm, weight at 180 cm 2040 grams,97-62-86. Mounted 3-pin cable, boot Alico Ski March. I bought this ski for two purposes, norpining (leather boot telemarking) at my vertically challenged Michigan resorts, and a rolling hill country (again lower vertical) tours for turns ski.
From first handling of this ski it is different than any skis I have handled. It has what I consider significant rocker, especially compressed, sorry I did not take a measurement for my initial impression review. I have not skied it in powder, but I will be very surprised if the tips do not come up very easily. Also this is the lightest ski I have handled, it is almost a half pound lighter per pair than the 178 cm Objective, which is regarded as a light ski. Another thing I noticed immediately is the bases easily compress base to base and they were not significantly cambered.
Getting to the ski hill one of my first concerns was, would it kick and glide? Would it slide straight or wander all over. I waxed with Swix polar over the entire ski the night previous, then waxed with Swix blue from heel to the easy skin slots in front. It kicked and glided nice and straight, my initial impression is that it will be pleasant to tour for turns with. Snow conditions were a few inches of fresh over well cared for refrozen. The blue was gone after an hour or two of downhill skiing. I think base binder and natural snow would extend this time, but I will probably need to carry wax if I plan on touring for those turns for several hours.
As for the turning part, I can offer better insight with more time on these skis. They are light and very quick edge to edge. I don't see them as hard snow carvers, but they are firm underfoot. I think they will prove to be short turn skis when it is hard, preferably finding what snow is there. As long as there is snow underneath them they are fun to let them run. I really need to put some time on a ski before I rave about it, but I think I will be pleased with this ski for the purposes for which it was purchased. I can't say for certain, but my initial impression is that if you were skiing bigger eastern mountains, or wanting to ski plastic boots you would want something more stout.
As I ski this ski more, I will be able to offer better insight into just what this ski does and doesn't do. At this point in time I am quite happy with this ski. That is a pretty good review from me at this stage.
Last edited by fisheater on Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

anemic

Rank: XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:39 pm

Re: Falketind 62 Norpining inital impressions

Postby anemic » Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:39 pm

Super cool skis!! The beautiful shape is fun to view from one chair behind you. It sounds a lot like the Eon 62. Surprising to hear the pocket is soft. I expected a stiffer pocket. I bet that is a fun ski. Cool setup you’ve got, fisheater.

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Call it Nordic Freeride

User avatar
fisheater

Rank: XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:06 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI

Re: Falketind 62 Norpining inital impressions

Postby fisheater » Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:01 pm

Dell, I don't really think I did a good job in my description. There is not a wax pocket, at least what I would call a wax pocket. There is no area that with half my weight does not touch the snow. It is a single cambered ski designed to turn. However Asnes describes this as a moderate wax pocket. I know on those short uphill traverses I could kick and glide faster than the alpine skaters were going. It definitely is tuned for off piste snow, but it is designed for "long trips in demanding and steep terrain" Asnes words. It most definitely was not designed for refrozen and compressed man-made. Because of the rocker it does have a pretty short effective edge, too short (I believe) to arc across the fall line. However I felt power and control when I kept the turns shorter, unweighted stronger and set the edges with a little authority. I will need some miles to get where I need to be. It is unfortunate that my operator error at this time cannot give an accurate assessment of the limit.
I really do not believe this ski to be similar to an Eon 62. They are similar in weight, I believe the FT 62 weighs about 20 grams more. I do believe they are both tuned for soft snow, but the FT 62 has a poplar and carbon fiber core. I had black dust when I drilled it. The Eon 162 has a Multi-core of laminated wood. I would think the laminations would be engineered to provide camber, I am not quite sure if that configuration would provide the torsional rigidity. I don't know, I would enjoy taking one for a ride. They sure are popular, and it is a tried and true design. I do know I felt more confident on the FT 62 then I did on the S-112. However, that too may just be feeling and not fact. I can't be sure without comparing under like conditions. I will not be doing that soon. I want to spend some time on the FT, both piste and touring for turns.

anemic

Rank: XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:39 pm

Re: Falketind 62 Norpining inital impressions

Postby anemic » Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:28 pm

Cool. It would be fun to meet on the snow sometime and I’ll bring my leather boots and Eons! We can swap and ski em back2back!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Call it Nordic Freeride

User avatar
fisheater

Rank: XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:06 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI

Re: Falketind 62 Review

Postby fisheater » Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:22 pm

I have now had this ski out for another weekend, and have had the opportunity to put the ski into some different conditions. This is really different than any ski I have handled. The side cut is 97-62-86, but it really is not parabolic. The ski tapers to the pins, is relatively straight to the heel, then it tapers back towards the heel, where just in front of the twin tip (tail) it rounds back. The ski has a generous rocker when weighted.

Nick Falketind rocker.jpg

Nick Falketind rocker.jpg

boot on BP.jpg

Nick Falketind camber.jpg

I added some photos, to give some perspective. As you can see the ski does not have much camber, and now I have had a chance to kick around on it in some different conditions. I have kicked in hard packed skied out trails that were boot packed, not ideal for any ski. In those conditions, being a single cambered ski it did drag on the wax, and it did wander a bit under those conditions. I can say that it wandered much less than my S-112 would have under those conditions, and while I can't guarantee it was faster, it was certainly more pleasant than scales. I also think with experience one might be able to adjust wax to help glide, there is no adjusting scales. I also had the opportunity to kick on about 4" of powder over hardpack. This ski is tuned to soft snow! While the USGI would fly much faster in these conditions, even a single camber slides quite nicely in these conditions. The Falketind 62 likes to slide, even on only a modest amount of fresh. Did I mention the pair at 188 cm weigh only a hair over 4.5 lbs (2040 grams @ 180 cm)? Then the next day I had a chance to break trail in a little over a foot of fresh powder. These skis love powder! Breaking trail in these skis a this moderate depth of powder was a dream. The ski is tuned for just this, the flex is perfect. I really do not believe I would really get any more performance out of the USGI at this depth of snow. While there may be an advantage to have greater length, there is no advantage to double camber at this depth, at least for me. I can hardly wait for my next chance to take these skis out in the fresh. Most of my kicking was in a backcountry area of the area I was skiing at. I didn't have long kicks, some were just at the side of packed trails. Unfortunately I really widened the trail as there were always tracks where I broke trail the next time through. One final thing I wanted to mention, is that on the soft snow day, I had kick wax left in a "wax pocket"? I don't know what you call it on a single cambered ski, but there was still kick wax from half way between the binding and the kicker skin clip down to just in front of the heel piece after 5 hours of lift served skiing. I had waxed the entire ski with artic white, and then put blue on a wax pocket from the kicker skin mount to the heel. All wax from outside the "pocket" was gone. I am not knowledgeable to say exactly what this means. I am just reporting my observations. Yes I was able to kick around all day. Without the fresh the day before wax was pretty much gone after 3 hours on the manmade. That first day had the benefit of base binder, tip to tail. Since I lost all that wax in three hours, I just used polar white the second day, as to me it is much easier to apply.
My first impressions of the ski were not what I would have liked as I was suffering from "left footitis", I was struggling with my left foot. "Left footitis" reared it's ugly head my first couple of runs my first day of last weekend and then disappeared. While I can say this ski is not an ice ski, it can ski the groomed. The edges inspire much more confidence than my S-112. Perhaps it is just the narrow width under foot, but torsionally it seems more powerful under foot. It certainly does not make that snowboard on edge sound the S-bound makes. It is quick edge to edge, and it is certainly stable on edge even at speed. I finally was able to turn up the speed fast enough to feel a breeze through my thick wool pants. By the end of the day, I was able to say I am quite pleased with this ski as a Michigan resort ski for leather boots. The next morning there was 12" of fresh, much more than I expected. We went straight to the back country area, and I had a few runs in untouched. While the S-112 is a great ski in 12", this ski was just as good. This ski was also much more pleasant on the kick back. So much so, that I really took longer routes just to put it through it's paces. Now I had another new experience when we skied the regular lift served. The snow was totally chopped and I got my butt handed to me. It was a combination of factors, including that I found the limit to the power of the Ski March boot. I actually had the boots torqueing back and forth on my rear foot. While I think plastic boots and a beefier ski would be better in those conditions, I don't think that the rig was over it's head, it was the operator that day. I managed a few good runs that day in those conditions, when I was really on top of it. However tired legs from ripping hard the day before, just finding my left foot, and tough conditions ate me up. I finally found the limit of my leather boots, however I think I have the ability to improve. I did find a limit of where the boot can bail me out.
In closing from my perspective this is really a nice ski for touring for turns in my hill country. I guess I need to find a snow depth limit to this ski, but I can tell that it really marginalizes my uses for the S-112. The 112 may have been better in the chopped, if not just using T-4's and Hardwires. I would definitely consider an Eggi, or a Tind in the future as well as an Objective or Vector. After my brief amount of time on this ski, I would advise somebody to consider the Falketind 68 for similar use. There is a possibility the FT 68 could be more versatile. However when you buy a ski on assumption you don't know until you own it. I can say I am pleased with this ski, at this point I believe this ski will be pretty beat up before I look for a replacement.


Return to “Community Ski Reviews”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests