Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Real reviews by real skiers. What a concept! Add your own today. Reviews only please, questions can be posted as replies but new threads looking for opinions should be posted to the main Telemark Talk Forum.
User avatar
TheSweed
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2019 11:14 am

Re: Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Post by TheSweed » Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:05 pm

Would like them more downhill friendly to of course then my Excursion. We talking most of the time rolling hills and so on.

User avatar
Woodserson
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 11:25 am
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
Favorite Skis: DH: Voile V6, Altai KOMs, XCD: Asnes FT62, XC: Nansen, E99, Bonna 1800
Favorite boots: T2Eco, T4, Rossignol BCX10
Occupation: Retro Rager-grouch. Flailmeister. E99 Nerd

Re: Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Post by Woodserson » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:33 pm

TheSweed wrote:
Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:02 pm
Hi, nice review!

I have my Fischer Excursion 88 189cm now with Riva 3 use my Svartisen 75mm(like to practice telemark)
But would like better flow if we got little more and deep snow this winter:)

Looked first at Åsnes Raab but mybe the Nosi 76 or the Stortind 86 would work better(181cm and 94kg)???
Are they any diffrent crosscountry camber and so on?
Are they us the same kind of skin? Little skeptical about the skin.... Like fishscale.
One post above you:
Johnny wrote:
Mon Nov 23, 2020 9:53 am
Single camber, alpine style... They sure work with kick wax... But not super efficient because of the low camber...
Skins... you only use it when you want to use it, you take it off when you don't...





User avatar
Nitram Tocrut
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
Ski style: "Doorstep" backcountry skiing and groomed trails
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad and FT62, Fischer Europa 99 and Madschus TL-70
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska 75 mm
Occupation: Organic vegetable grower and many other things!

Re: Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Post by Nitram Tocrut » Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:52 pm

TeleMarcin wrote:
Sat Nov 21, 2020 4:54 pm
Hi, could someone comment on the Nosi camber ? Would It camber allow for effective use of the kick wax? Do you think It will go with nnn Bc magnum and Alfa guards?

Greetings from Poland!

Marcin
I can’t comment directly about the Nosi, but I have skied the Rabb and i assume the camber is somewhat similar. I do use kick wax with them but I think the best option is to use the short skins whenever you have to tour with them. I don’t find them particularly interesting to ski any distance on the flat or rolling terrain to get to a DH playground where those skis shines. I cant tell for the Nosi but I assume it is quite similar but the Nosi is maybe slightly better as their are skimo like skis... it that is omg an assumption. For covering some distances to get to the DH playground my choice is the FT62





User avatar
TeleMarcin
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:52 pm
Location: Saska Kępa, Warsaw, Poland

Re: Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Post by TeleMarcin » Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:42 am

Thanks for all replies. I was looking online to purchase Nosi somewhere in Europe and it appeared that I could not find it anywhere. I wrote an email to Asens and they replied to me:
"Hei hei. Thanks for your email.This Nosi ski is not produced this season, so maybe not so easy to get hold of this ski."

I think I will stay with my Ingstads this season although the GAS is strong with me. I am rationalizing not buying new Asens this year, with hope for Rotefella New Backcountry system coming next season :D :D :D I hope covid will not postpone its development.

Cheers, M





User avatar
TheSweed
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2019 11:14 am

Re: Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Post by TheSweed » Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:38 am

E-mailed too a reseller in Norway about the Nosi. He told the Nosi going to comeback in a new constractions. But couldnt say any other details about it.

So at least they have not totally dropped the plan of Nosi 76..





User avatar
jyw5
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 1:52 am

Re: Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Post by jyw5 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:47 am

I am looking to replace my S112 next season. I think the Nosi 76 might be it.

I honestly never did like the scales on the S112. Nice to have when your skins fail but when that happens, the scales arent that grippy anyway. I keep skins on for most of the late spring and summer when I use the S112.

I haven't even skiied the S112s since September. Cecilie has been my favorite this winter. The FT62 was great earlier in the season when the snow wasn't so deep. We now have icy wind crust with bottomless powder beneath...I wonder how the Nosi would do in those conditions. I am unable to ski those conditions on moderate slopes with any of my skis.

I hope Nosi returns next season. Looks like a ski I could use 50% of the time if it is similar to or better than the S112. I would give up some turning ability for more kick and glide.

Would also like to feel how different it is to the FT62.
I have not tried the FT62 yet in late spring and summer corn, mash, and crust. Would be nice to compare.

I reread all that helpful info from feb 2020. thanks for everyone's help. its been one incredible journey.

btw, I am liking my ft62 better this season...it helps to be a better skiier too.





User avatar
Ullr
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:34 am
Location: Norway
Ski style: Touring/Telemark
Favorite Skis: Åsnes Ingstad
Favorite boots: Asolo Extreme
Occupation: Graphic designer

Re: Åsnes NOSI 76 Ski Review

Post by Ullr » Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:17 am

I have owned the Nosi 76 a little over a year. Length is 180 cm (I am 190 cm). Bindings are Voile Traverse and I mostly use the skis with my Scarpa T4s, but sometimes with a pair of old Garmount Tour leather boots from the early nineties. The combination of Nosi an Voile Traverse is very lightweight. Even with the T4s it is light enough to spend the whole day comfortably skiing back country. I use short skins from Åsnes for the steepest hills and kickwax when conditions are good.

The skis have a fair bit of rocker and an upturned tail. This make them feel a lot shorter than they are – good for quick turns, but not perfect for fast carving turns. Together with the very low weight, this makes them a very playful pair of skis.

I have not ridden deep powder yet, but I think they will do goodm even considering their relative low width. They don’t like ice or icy pistes, being so soft, light and rockered, but in good snow they are fun and nimble.

In flat terrain or going uphill, their lightness make them good if the snow is not too deep. On hard surfaces the slip sideways having no tracking groove in the sole and they (of course) won’t fit in premade tracks, but on untouched snow they are surprisingly similar to my Ingstads.

I feel the Voile Traverse is a really god fit for these skis. I ski them with the cable springs always attached, but free resting on the skis. Then I can easily attach them when needed. If I need even more control, I replace the voile springs with harder springed cables from a pair of old Rottefella Chilli bindings.

Positive
  • Lightweight
  • Fun
  • Easy to turn
  • Access skin-inserts


Negative
  • Camber a little bit too soft for me
  • Could have been longer (for me. 180 is the longest made)
Would I recommend these skis? Hell yes! but not for cross country skiing. These are perfect for earning your turns: Find a hill or mountain, ski up, ski down, repeat.





Post Reply