filling in negative fishscales

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
Post Reply
User avatar
riel
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:31 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: BC XC
Favorite Skis: Asnes Gamme, Ingstad & Støretind, Fischer Mountain Cross & E99
Favorite boots: Fischer BCX675
Website: https://surriel.com/
Contact:

filling in negative fishscales

Post by riel » Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:25 am

A while ago there were a whole bunch of cheap Asnes Sondre skis on eBay, some of which were nearly smooth on the bottom, and many of which had negative fishscales cut into them. I ended up with two pairs, a 210cm pair that was almost smooth on the bottom, and a 200cm pair that had fairly deep negative fishscales in the bottom.

I ended up skiing the 210cm ones a lot last winter, while the 200cm skis sat in the basement with the idea that I might turn them into skin skis at some point, or do something else with them. After this season ended, and I looked back at just how much fun I had with kick wax, I decided on something else. Fill in those negative fishscales with ptex, and make these skis waxable, too!
skiwithscales.jpg
one smooth-ish, one still with fishscales
How did I do it? Follow these simple steps:
1) Brush out and roughen up the negative fishscales.
2) Light a ptex candle, and drip ptex into the fishscales. How much ptex? TOO MUCH PTEX!
3) Wait for the ptex to cool and shrink, see that it wasn't quite enough.
4) Scrape off the excess that's already there.
5) Light another ptex candle, and melt more ptex into the remaining holes.
6) Wait for the ptex to cool and shrink, again. Maybe this time there's enough?
7) Fill in a few more last minute remaining divots.
8) Scrape the excess ptex again.
9) Some more light scraping to smooth things out.

It almost sounds like more work than it was...
smoothskis.jpg
both are nice and smooth now

User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: filling in negative fishscales

Post by Stephen » Fri Jun 18, 2021 1:20 pm

I was thinking the same thing for a pair I have and wondering if a base grind after all the p-Texing would be worth it?
Also, I was thinking to pass a flame over the fish scale, before the p-Tex, to improve adhesion.



User avatar
Woodserson
Posts: 2995
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer

Re: filling in negative fishscales

Post by Woodserson » Fri Jun 18, 2021 2:05 pm

Remind me, what did we say the Sondre's were like? A softer Amundsen, almost same dimensions, but stiffer than the Nansens... Was that it?



User avatar
fisheater
Posts: 2622
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:06 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI
Ski style: All my own, and age doesn't help
Favorite Skis: Gamme 54, Falketind 62, I hope to add a third soon
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska, Alico Ski March
Occupation: Construction Manager

Re: filling in negative fishscales

Post by fisheater » Fri Jun 18, 2021 8:19 pm

Nice job Riel!



User avatar
riel
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:31 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: BC XC
Favorite Skis: Asnes Gamme, Ingstad & Støretind, Fischer Mountain Cross & E99
Favorite boots: Fischer BCX675
Website: https://surriel.com/
Contact:

Re: filling in negative fishscales

Post by riel » Fri Jun 18, 2021 8:59 pm

Stephen wrote:
Fri Jun 18, 2021 1:20 pm
I was thinking the same thing for a pair I have and wondering if a base grind after all the p-Texing would be worth it?
Also, I was thinking to pass a flame over the fish scale, before the p-Tex, to improve adhesion.
Most of the fishscales are in what will be the kick zone, anyway. I plan to just iron in base binder or polar wax to smooth out the last few dimples in the base.

As for the flame, I just held the ptex candle close by the skis while it burned. Close enough that it might do what you suggest ;)

However, roughing the base of these fishscale gouges with a metal brush, and then cleaning that out with a soft brush might help more with adhesion, since that gives more surface area for the new and the old ptex to bind. Passing a flame over the base might reduce the surface area available for the two to bind, interfere with wax adhesion afterwards, and potentially reduce how well the base is bonded to the core of the ski.

Expect to use close to one and a half sticks of ptex per ski.
Woodserson wrote:
Fri Jun 18, 2021 2:05 pm
Remind me, what did we say the Sondre's were like? A softer Amundsen, almost same dimensions, but stiffer than the Nansens... Was that it?
Let me rate them with some other skis that we have both used :)

K&G speed: Traverse 78 < Ingstad < Sondre < Gamme < MT51
Turning: MT51 < Sondre < Gamme < T78 / Ingstad (depending on conditions & terrain)
Stability at speed: MT51 < T78 (chatter) < Sondre / Gamme < ingstad (depending on conditions)
Edge hold in hard/icy conditions: MT51 < T78 < Ingstad < Sondre / Gamme (Sondre maybe better?)
Flotation: MT51 < Sondre / Gamme / T78 < Ingstad (don't know how the middle ones rate against each other, Gamme may be better than Sondre & T78)

I hope these ratings also make it clear why I'm thinking of getting Gamme skis for the coming season, since those are a step up from the Sondre skis in many ways, without ever really being worse at anything (except price).

Whether I get a pair of Otto Sverdrup skis as well will depend on where they fit into the quiver compared to the other skis. If they provide better K&G speed, stability at speed, edge hold, and turning than the Ingstad and the T78, they might become a ski of choice for when I need more turning and float than Gamme can offer, but want more efficiency than Ingstad and T78 can offer...



User avatar
fgd135
Posts: 475
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:55 pm
Location: Colorado
Ski style: Yes, sometimes.
Favorite Skis: Most of them
Favorite boots: Boots that fit
Occupation: Yes

Re: filling in negative fishscales

Post by fgd135 » Tue Jun 29, 2021 5:29 pm

That's a lot of work; I saw those cheap skis on fleabay and decided to pass, seems an interesting project at least.
Some ski shops will completely replace bases, or do the repairs needed on butchered bases like on those Sondres, using a full base extruder followed by a base grind. It's really something to watch! Automatic feed, coat, grind.
Ski rental shops are the big customers for that kind of work, as it keeps their (alpine) rental fleets usable for more than one season.
The extruded material adheres much better than the ptex candle method, as there's no carbon from burning, which can prevent long term adhesion.
It's probably expensive to have done for just a single pair of skis even if you can locate a shop that has the machinery...and the skill to do it correctly.



"To me, gracefulness on skis should be the end-all of the sport" --Stein Eriksen



Post Reply