Not sure if this has been posted here -- a friend just emailed it to me.
https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-a ... thill-guy/
marquette ski/shoe article from Outside magazine
-
stilltryin
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:12 pm
- Location: WYO USA
- Ski style: Wandering the untracked (by humans)
- Favorite Skis: Voile V6 BC; Karhu XCD/GT
- Favorite boots: Scarpa T3; Alpina Alaska NNN-BC
- Occupation: ExFed
Re: marquette ski/shoe article from Outside magazine
Just goes to show that no matter how wierd or funky the ski, there is some set of conditions and/or some skier for which/whom it is ideal.
-
stilltryin
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:12 pm
- Location: WYO USA
- Ski style: Wandering the untracked (by humans)
- Favorite Skis: Voile V6 BC; Karhu XCD/GT
- Favorite boots: Scarpa T3; Alpina Alaska NNN-BC
- Occupation: ExFed
Re: marquette ski/shoe article from Outside magazine
Marquette: 140 long; 150-130-140 (seriously wider than the Hok).
Hok: 125/145 long; 124-110-122.
Due to it's skin, Hok probably climbs better (a bit easier to find a good line), but is less durable.
Anyone seen both in action on the down?
Hok: 125/145 long; 124-110-122.
Due to it's skin, Hok probably climbs better (a bit easier to find a good line), but is less durable.
Anyone seen both in action on the down?