Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4249
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by lilcliffy » Tue Apr 11, 2023 8:18 am

Krummholz wrote:
Thu Apr 06, 2023 9:07 pm
What about a Fischer TRANSNORDIC 82 EASY SKIN XTRALITE in 206cm, 82-60-70 mm, wax? Long, wide, stiff. So made to go straight and as fast a possible on a wide ski in deep snow.
Note that if the current TN82 is the same design as the last-gen E-109 Xtralite- it is not stiff- at all- and is totally unstable in deep snow. And the round, low-profile tip couple with the very soft significantly rockered shovel make them terrible at breaking trail in deep snow.

If the TN82 has a more stable flex than the E109XL- please ignore my statements above.
I would like to buy, but only on sale, I’m a cheap dirtbag skier that got the Asnes USGI 200cm,
The Asnes USGI (MT65) on the other hand- while very heavy- is rock solid stable in deep snow- and the high-profile, triangular tip- with zero rocker- makes them a trail-breaking machine.
I don’t think any ski “floats” on top of snow, in deep Rockies powder I’m lucky if I’m only ankle deep as opposed to boot top deep.
This↑ is perhaps too absolute a statement (because IMO experience it greatly depends on the nature of the deep snow- in particular how much moisture there is in it)- but- regardless- a highly relevant statement-
the current trend is to obsess over flotation in general-
the only skis that really float in truly deep soft powder snow are VERY wide underfoot and are tuned for downhill skiing (or shuffling around in dense boreal forest)- and the downhill designs have wide, round, low-profile rockered tips and shovels- that encourage planing-
planing can only occur at downhill speeds- no one can XC ski fast enough in truly deep soft snow for a ski to plane.

XC skiing in truly deep soft snow is about stability, and techniques that involve efficient movement through the snow- not on top of it- and the ancient dance of balancing grip and glide.
For example- I float much higher in the snow collumn on my Altai Hok than my Combat NATO- but, I can travel much more efficiently on the Combat ski, despite being deeper in the snow.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.

User avatar
Wenay
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2024 8:49 am

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by Wenay » Thu Dec 26, 2024 1:16 pm

Hey Chris, reading your post brought me back to some of my solo trips through snowy backcountry, although I’ve never been as deep into gear specifics. I’ve had those moments sinking too far into soft snow, and upgrading skis made a massive difference. I swapped to a broader ski (Rossignol BC110 in my case), and while it wasn’t perfect, the extra flotation felt like a lifesaver, especially on long pushes uphill pulling gear. Waxing was also a game-changer when tackling firmer conditions. I didn’t know how much I hated fish scales until I switched.

For overnights, I’d say prioritize versatility in your setup. In Florida, I had a different experience exploring River Ranch’s glamping options, which were less about snow and more about indulging in unique outdoor adventures. If you want a break from the cold and a vibe switch, you might want to check out this resort page for some ideas.
Last edited by Wenay on Mon Dec 30, 2024 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
aclyon
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 1:59 pm
Location: South Lake Tahoe
Ski style: adapt or die
Occupation: mastering engineer, electronic musician
Website: http://xexify.com

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by aclyon » Thu Dec 26, 2024 7:01 pm

I'm not really sure any XC ski truly "floats" on fresh deep powder. I use s-bound 112's during winter months (just pulled them out for their first day today! been on traverse 78 every other day so far), which is one of the widest XC skis available, and i constantly find myself anywhere from ankle to knee deep in snow, depending on how big the storm was. but-- they cut through that deep powder as efficiently as i could hope for. the bottom line though, is that cutting fresh tracks is work! that's why in the winter i structure a lot of my touring as out and backs, basically laboriously laying tracks on the way out, and enjoying my tracks back, maybe sometimes lapping my tracks for extra fun.

so although i do recommend adding the 112 to your quiver, don't expect it to float that much higher than the 98. do expect it to slice the powder more efficiently, but not so much so that it magically becomes "easy". and for your purposes i think it's total overkill to get an expensive voile ski, though a vector would certainly "float" in the more expected sense.



User avatar
voilenerd
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:26 am

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by voilenerd » Fri Dec 27, 2024 9:03 am

I’d get something that you can ski one of the Volcanos in the spring when the snow is all consolidated and “safer”. But that is just me. Voile Endeavor would be a great ski for that.



User avatar
JohnSKepler
Posts: 591
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2022 6:31 pm
Location: Utahoming
Ski style: XCBCD
Favorite Skis: Voile Objective BC, Rossignol BC 80
Favorite boots: Scarpa F1 Bellows, Alpina Alaska XP
Occupation: Rocket Scientist

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by JohnSKepler » Sun Dec 29, 2024 3:07 pm

chris_the_wrench wrote:
Thu Apr 06, 2023 8:19 pm
lilcliffy wrote:
Thu Apr 06, 2023 2:45 pm
In addition- I note that you are using NNNBC boots- if you want to keep using your boots- this is going to potentially limit the width of the ski you might consider- though this limit is a complex of the particulat boot, the snow conditions, and the skills of the skier.

Casacades? Moisture-rich snow?
Im not happy with my boots, Im considering swapping to 3 pin anyways. East side of the Cascades, it's amazing what a few miles east of the pct will do to the moisture!
Responding to an old post so I'm sure this decision has been made long ago but it may help others.

I've been experimenting a lot with Xplore, 3-pin, and TechToe the last few years. I'm fairly new to the sport and jettisoned NNNBC rather quickly. For the conditions described I think the Xplore binding with maybe a Lundhags Abisku would be an excellent combination. While my experience with 3-pin is not extensive I know I do not care for them in deep snow, especially if the snow is sticky or wet. In my case I found it builds up under the foot and is very hard to clear. The Xplore on the other hand, with it's much greater range of motion, is almost always easy to clear with a vigorous shake of the foot.

I would recommend the Abisku over either the Alpina Alaska and the Alfa Free. The Alaska is a bit soft in the ankle for the turns you're looking for and the Free bends too far forward to provide effective control. I still use my Alaska for narrower skis, skiing in track, and light offtrack with, say, a Rossi BC80, but they aren't up to controlling a FT62 or the Voile Objective. The Abiskus do well with both of this skis though can struggle with the Objective in deep, heavy snow.

I was skiing exactly what the OP had described in the opening post yesterday. I was with a small group (wife, son, daughter in law) who had little experience XC but are decent athletes and know how to ski. They stayed for the most part on a 'groomed' area that had a few inches of new snow. (Probably just a snowmobile had been through.) Two of them were on BC80 and one was on a Voile Objective. All were Xplore+Alaska. I was on a 172cm FT62 using a 58mm Xskin, which was perfect. Off the groomed area the snow was a few feet of fresh, heavy snow. It was not powder. It was a low angle out and back; up going in, down coming out.

As the most experienced I was doing a lot off off-track and was quite surprised how well the FT62 was handling everything. It had exceptional kick and glide on the snowed over kind-of groomed track. Was not miserable on fresh snowmobile tracks. It supported me well enough in the deep snow to break trail and to climb. It floated well enough to pick up a little speed and give me some good turns on some low 20-25 degree hills.

My son on the Objective was struggling so I offered to swap. He instantly preferred the FT62, and so did I. I generally like the Objective but it was awful. Performance on the track was very poor as it would not track straight but tended to slide laterally. It broke trail well and the scales did their job nicely but downhill performance was awful with very little lateral control. It felt like it was compacting snow just under the ski and then sliding off the compacted area. I felt like a long, narrower, stiff ski would have given me much better directional control and been less prone to 'sliding off.'

Incidentally, the BC80s did really well on the snowed-over and fresh snowmobile tracks but were not wide enough or long enough to excel off track. They did climb well with the scales but proved difficult to turn coming down, though I was the only one in the group that actually knows how to Tele turn and I use 'know' very loosely here!
Veni, Vidi, Viski



User avatar
chris_the_wrench
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:29 pm

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by chris_the_wrench » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:25 am

Since I started this thread, i figured i come back around. I ended up swapping the nnnbc off the sbound 98s and ive been running 3 pin with removable cables. For boots Im running the Alaskans. Ive been pretty happy with this setup for ‘downhill’ oriented days. They dont glide particularly well, and they sink in deep snow, but they can do alot of conditions pretty ok. I REALLY like the stability of the 3pin and alaskan boots when I hit a downhill section that is chewed up by snowmobiles(compared to nnnbc and lighter boots).



User avatar
randoskier
Posts: 1228
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:08 am
Location: Yank in Italy
Ski style: awkward
Favorite Skis: snow skis
Favorite boots: go-go
Occupation: International Pop Sensation

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by randoskier » Sun Jan 12, 2025 3:57 pm

chris_the_wrench wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:25 am
Since I started this thread, i figured i come back around. I ended up swapping the nnnbc off the sbound 98s and ive been running 3 pin with removable cables. For boots Im running the Alaskans. Ive been pretty happy with this setup for ‘downhill’ oriented days. They dont glide particularly well, and they sink in deep snow, but they can do alot of conditions pretty ok. I REALLY like the stability of the 3pin and alaskan boots when I hit a downhill section that is chewed up by snowmobiles(compared to nnnbc and lighter boots).
Go for the Forest skis! 300cm!

https://www.kiteensuksi.fi/Ski-1/Forest-Skis



User avatar
chris_the_wrench
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:29 pm

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by chris_the_wrench » Sun Jan 12, 2025 7:05 pm

randoskier wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 3:57 pm

Go for the Forest skis! 300cm!

https://www.kiteensuksi.fi/Ski-1/Forest-Skis
I cant wrap my head around that. Im 190cm tall, but woah.



User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4249
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by lilcliffy » Sun Jan 12, 2025 7:11 pm

chris_the_wrench wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:25 am
Since I started this thread, i figured i come back around. I ended up swapping the nnnbc off the sbound 98s and ive been running 3 pin with removable cables. For boots Im running the Alaskans. Ive been pretty happy with this setup for ‘downhill’ oriented days. They dont glide particularly well, and they sink in deep snow, but they can do alot of conditions pretty ok. I REALLY like the stability of the 3pin and alaskan boots when I hit a downhill section that is chewed up by snowmobiles(compared to nnnbc and lighter boots).
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the update-
curious- whay NNNBC boot were you using before switching to Alaska 75?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



User avatar
chris_the_wrench
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:29 pm

Re: Long trips, deep snow, but very low angle

Post by chris_the_wrench » Sun Jan 12, 2025 7:58 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 7:11 pm
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the update-
curious- whay NNNBC boot were you using before switching to Alaska 75?
Ive got some Madshus Vida nnnbc boots. I couldn’t drive sbound 98s with them but i still use them with my salomon escapes with a 52 waist. Work pretty dang well with those salomons on snowpark trails. I cant say for certain but they have to be one of the lighter nnnnbc boots. Tongues are falling apart, i doubt they will last beyond this year.



Post Reply