Fischer Spider 62 sizing advice

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4277
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer Spider 62 sizing advice

Post by lilcliffy » Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:19 pm

spopepro wrote:
Tue Jan 21, 2025 8:13 pm
Fischer transnordic 59 ez skin (not twin skin) in 210. Then just use the kicker skins at all times.
Do you leave the kicker skins on when skiiing downhill?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.

User avatar
spopepro
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: Fischer Spider 62 sizing advice

Post by spopepro » Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:46 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:19 pm
spopepro wrote:
Tue Jan 21, 2025 8:13 pm
Fischer transnordic 59 ez skin (not twin skin) in 210. Then just use the kicker skins at all times.
Do you leave the kicker skins on when skiiing downhill?
Yep. She has them trimmed at the back a couple of cm ahead of the back of her heel. It's not dramatically different at that point than drag from an aggressive crown pattern. It's not the setup that I personally would want to run, but she's pretty happy with the tradeoff between a little extra drag and significant grip and stability.

Generally, I think a more aggressive pattern or a kicker skin on a full double cambered ski is a better way to go than the softer single or camber + a half skis that the market tends to push towards recreational skiers.



User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4277
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer Spider 62 sizing advice

Post by lilcliffy » Tue Jan 28, 2025 8:29 am

@spopepro
Do the Easy-Skins stay on downhill?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



User avatar
spopepro
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: Fischer Spider 62 sizing advice

Post by spopepro » Tue Jan 28, 2025 3:43 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
Tue Jan 28, 2025 8:29 am
@spopepro
Do the Easy-Skins stay on downhill?
Yes, they stick rather well. I think it might be different if a) the weren't trimmed shorter and b) she was trying to make tele or parallel turns. But for plowing, they stay attached the whole time without fuss.



User avatar
aclyon
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 1:59 pm
Location: South Lake Tahoe
Ski style: adapt or die
Occupation: mastering engineer, electronic musician, ski instructor (alpine)
Website: http://xexify.com

Re: Fischer Spider 62 sizing advice

Post by aclyon » Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:50 am

ChasingVert wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:26 pm
Thanks, @aclyon! I appreciate the insights based on our local terrain! I'll definitely have to figure out my ski situation before you would want to go out with me. Currently, I'm just all kinds of frustrated when I got out. That doesn't make for good company. :|

Since you've used Spiders in our area, do you have any sizing insights that might help me with my buying decision?
Sorry for the delayed response, I'm traveling in India right now! No ski days for a minute hehe...
I think at your weight and height you could probably go pretty long! Especially with that ski which is not very turning oriented-- might as well maximize its touring efficiency. I'm only 5'9" 165 lbs and I would almost certainly go for the 179, so I think 199 is probably quite appropriate. I ride the s-bound 112 in 179 and the traverse 78 in 186 and wouldn't want either of those any shorter. Let me know when you figure out your quiver drama, I'll be back in Feb and would love to have another touring buddy!



Post Reply