Panorama M62: contradictory reviews...

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
DPO777
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:00 pm
Location: Canada
Ski style: Cross Country, BackCountry, Out the back door Country
Favorite Skis: Karhu XCD GTs, refurbished cherry wood top unknown skis from early 80s, Gammie 54s, e99s
Favorite boots: 3-Pin Alico leathers. RIP Crispi 3-Pin leathers. Now the warm and comfortable Rossi X10 BC Boots
Occupation: Semi-Retired from construction now upgrading older ski stuff to more modern technology, starting with BC bindings for now.

Re: Panorama M62: contradictory reviews...

Post by DPO777 » Wed Feb 12, 2025 4:44 pm

lowangle al wrote:
Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:40 am
That was a nice video with some good skiing but like all of the light gear videos from Japan they're skiing good conditions. Old tele movies from the past, before plastic boots, show people busting through crust and skiing more extreme and variable terrain. Even with the good conditions in the video some faceplants were made.

So one of two things, when conditions get bad they either switch to heavier gear or wait for things to get better. Or maybe they don't post videos from crappy, humbling days.
Sure looked like they had a blast though and were humble enough to show some wipeouts. I like the recovery on 5:36. good think not to hit anything solid on a head roll like that!

Aren't all the new 2025 panorama m78/m68/m62s sporting the shorter version the old Karhu Omnitrak (Good setuo on the Karhu XCD GTs)

With the M62 having a higher more Nordic camber.

I think the older 2020/21 M62 had a more alpine camber and Intelligrip Transition Skin and no scales. At that time I think the M62 was the widest in the Panorama line.

Also noted the newer Panoramas M62s are made in China. Note sure if the earlier version was.

It is alway harder to see in detail the patterned bases on dark bottom layer skis on vendors pictures. The M62 is no exception.

This video shows the OmniGrip base at the right angles with the right light. As well it appears the metal edges don't wrap around the tips.



The M78s in video I believe are bending more towards the Alpine camber than the M62s that I believe are leaning towards the Nordic camber.

I am surprised that the new ones didn't also include kicker skin slot as well as they appear to use a shorter version of the Omnitrak over the much longer Karhu version. You would be stuck to a full skin.

I never attempted to stick a skin to fish scales and wonder how they stay stuck.

Wow I forgot how heavy the old XCDs are compared to the newer light skis such as the e99 xtralites. Guess that was normal lugging that extra weight back in the 80s and they didn't bounce around as much as the lighter new skis.
omni4.JPG
Slightly shorter version of Omnitrak appears to be M62 version
omni2.jpg
Long older version Omnitrak on XCD GTs
omni.jpg
Panorama appears to use a shorter version of the Omnitrak for more waxable glide on flats and less downhill resistance I assume
fischer track.jpg
Long forward but not as far back as old Omnitrak. Skin attaches within scales
m62.jpg
Panorama M62 2025 higher camber
17m62.jpg
2021 skin

User avatar
wabene
Posts: 745
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:53 am
Location: Duluth Minnesota
Ski style: Stiff kneed and wide eyed.
Favorite Skis: Åsnes Gamme, Fischer SB98 & TN66, Mashus M50, M78, Pano M62
Favorite boots: Crispi Svartsen 75mm, Crispi Bre and Crispi Nordland BC
Occupation: Carpenter

Re: Panorama M62: contradictory reviews...

Post by wabene » Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:48 pm

DPO777 wrote:
Wed Feb 12, 2025 4:44 pm


I never attempted to stick a skin to fish scales and wonder how they stay stuck.
I've used used an Easy Skin on SB98's hauling a tobaggan over a big hill to a cabin many times and they work great! You don't have to worry about kick wax contaminating the glue. It's a clean surface to stick to and adheres well.



User avatar
DPO777
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:00 pm
Location: Canada
Ski style: Cross Country, BackCountry, Out the back door Country
Favorite Skis: Karhu XCD GTs, refurbished cherry wood top unknown skis from early 80s, Gammie 54s, e99s
Favorite boots: 3-Pin Alico leathers. RIP Crispi 3-Pin leathers. Now the warm and comfortable Rossi X10 BC Boots
Occupation: Semi-Retired from construction now upgrading older ski stuff to more modern technology, starting with BC bindings for now.

Re: Panorama M62: contradictory reviews...

Post by DPO777 » Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:48 am

wabene wrote:
Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:48 pm
DPO777 wrote:
Wed Feb 12, 2025 4:44 pm


I never attempted to stick a skin to fish scales and wonder how they stay stuck.
I've used used an Easy Skin on SB98's hauling a tobaggan over a big hill to a cabin many times and they work great! You don't have to worry about kick wax contaminating the glue. It's a clean surface to stick to and adheres well.
Yes thanks for that info. I figured the kick wax could get messy with a skin. Good to know they stick to clean scales Ok.

I bought a pair of X-skins on sale for the Gammie 54s. I haven't taken them out of the pouch yet. Not the plastic over the sofa syndrome (maybe a bit) more just haven't needed to use them out back on the new skis. Still getting used to them and testing different kick waxes as well as kick zones to get best glide without the slippy doo. Will be sure to clean off the kick wax before I try them.

After last nights snowfall may need some wider skis to get out the back door LOL

Didn't get out to play on the deep fresh stuff today with all the plowing and snow blowing.

Maybe tomorrow
today.jpg
This morning yesterdays tracks all buried
2 days.jpg
Good track yesterday



User avatar
Oldbie
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:09 pm

Re: Panorama M62: contradictory reviews...

Post by Oldbie » Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:48 pm

PXL_20250205_234351026.jpg
I guess these are the mark II or mark III version? I love these skis.



Post Reply