Voile 3p binding question

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
MikeK

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by MikeK » Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:39 pm

Voile claims that:

"The Heavy-Duty Mountaineer 3-pin is a solid, light touring telemark binding. Made from the same manufacturing tools as our 3-pin Cable it has a 3-pin bail height to accommodate a 13-19mm thick duckbill telemark boot. You can use this binding with virtually all telemark boots available. Mostly suited for mid-range to light duty boots. "

If your bill is less than 13mm thick, I'd be surprised. Mine came in at 15mm+.

Soooo... is Voile lying about the tooling being the same between the cable and the mountaineer? Or is your bill abnormally thin?

They don't give any specs for the cable bindings as to the bill thickness they will accept. It would be nice to know if there is a difference.

User avatar
Johnny
Site Admin
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God with leathers / Racing against the machine with plastics
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, XCD Comps, Objectives and S98s
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska XP, Alfa Guards, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by Johnny » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:18 am

Yep, mine is 15-16mm too.

I measured all my boots last week, and I was about to do some research on the "Nordic Norm"... I wanted to go thru all my old cross-country books but everything is still packed... And I need to fix this leaking roof...!

Voile is definitely lying here... 8-)

But that's the funny part: Only the latest version of the Voile bindings are problematic...
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."



MikeK

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by MikeK » Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:18 pm

Just got my cable bindings for my Annums. I measured the lowest bail height, it's almost exactly 15mm.

If you get a chance, measure yours. It's a bit tricky but it looks like if you have a bum pair, it might be a fluke.



User avatar
Johnny
Site Admin
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God with leathers / Racing against the machine with plastics
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, XCD Comps, Objectives and S98s
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska XP, Alfa Guards, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by Johnny » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:01 am

15 mm to secure a 15mm duckbill. Does that make any sense to you? Does the rubber from your boots get stuck over the binding when you turn, like in that first picture?

Image

Thanks for the idea. I measured all my bails at their lowest point. All my old voile and Rottefella Super Telemarks are 12-13mm. Which is perfect for all my boots.

But my 3 pairs of last year's Voile bindings are 15-16mm. Which is fucking useless. What, is it cheaper to make the bails higher?!?!?

Thanks for pointing this out. I think it's very clear now, you solved the mystery. Don't buy Voile's new bindings. True spirit telemark is dead. *Sigh*...
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."



MikeK

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by MikeK » Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:10 am

My bill is slightly preloaded with those, so it's right on the hairy edge.

And yeah I thought the scars on my boots were from falling, it's not. It's just how the bail hits the boot. I'm going to take the Dremel to it and reshape the boot.

It's not like your's though. Mine doesn't get stuck on the wing. It's easier to trim the boot. I'd just put a slight chamfer on the bottom edge of the tread so it won't get caught like that. Maybe also file a bit of a chamfer on the wing... It shouldn't affect the performance on the other bindings.

So yeah, they were lying. 13mm they are not. Mountaineers are the same. It's all the same tooling.

It's those plastic boots man... they all have a thicker bill. Voile is just keeping up with the times.

And once I figure out those inserts you won't have to worry about you pin holes getting all shitted up... the pins themselves look to be steel (I should check with a magnet) but they are probably soft... I'll check with a file. Bronze will surely work. Steel might be OK.



MikeK

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by MikeK » Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:30 pm

LoveJohnny wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. I think it's very clear now, you solved the mystery. Don't buy Voile's new bindings. True spirit telemark is dead. *Sigh*...
PS It ain't dead... I think it's trying to tell you something.

Pull all those cable bindings off and put on good old Super Teles. No cable. That's true XCD!

Image

XCD Lives on!



User avatar
Johnny
Site Admin
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God with leathers / Racing against the machine with plastics
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, XCD Comps, Objectives and S98s
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska XP, Alfa Guards, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by Johnny » Fri Dec 05, 2014 4:29 pm

I never, never use cables! (Unless for some strange reason I decide to go XCD skiing on ice...) They are too heavy. Plus I don't like the feeling. Not to mention they crush your feet.

Cables... Buckles... Pivot... Beurk!
While we're at it, why not ski with handcuffs? Or a chastity belt? Or a ball and chain?

I have a couple of pairs of SuperT. They are actually my favorite binding. I love them WAY MORE than the Voiles. But they are harder to find around here.

All my old SuperTs are ok. But what if the new ones are 15mm like the Voile ones?

Gee, I think that's the nail in the coffin: I'm not a Voile guy anymore. Never thought it would come to this...
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."



MikeK

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by MikeK » Fri Dec 05, 2014 4:41 pm

I think I'm going to switch as well.

I'll measure a pair. There are none in town but I know who carries them and I'll likely be there this season. For now, look for used ones.



User avatar
Raventele
BANNED!
BANNED!
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 9:14 am

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by Raventele » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:44 pm

LoveJohnny wrote:I never, never use cables! (Unless for some strange reason I decide to go XCD skiing on ice...) They are too heavy. Plus I don't like the feeling. Not to mention they crush your feet.

Cables... Buckles... Pivot... Beurk!
While we're at it, why not ski with handcuffs? Or a chastity belt? Or a ball and chain?

I have a couple of pairs of SuperT. They are actually my favorite binding. I love them WAY MORE than the Voiles. But they are harder to find around here.

All my old SuperTs are ok. But what if the new ones are 15mm like the Voile ones?

Gee, I think that's the nail in the coffin: I'm not a Voile guy anymore. Never thought it would come to this...
Right..or grace, or control, or authority, or maybe at speed ?
Voile 3pin/Cable/Hardwire forever!! With or without cable as desired..
"Everyone is helpful, everyone is kind, on the road to Shambala"



User avatar
Teleman
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:27 am

Re: Voile 3p binding question

Post by Teleman » Sat Dec 06, 2014 9:06 am

Voile is good but Rotta Super is superior in the bush....Found the cable is a waste of effort but could give a psychological boost at a ski area...With a double buckle boot or one buckle it's about the comfort and flex of the boot at the balls of your foot...Plastic can't equate that and voila there is the big difference.....Teleking raves and gives me mucho crapola about buckles but the ancient and would love to have them again (Fabiano's) ???? had a leather strap buckle....A really good leather boot...Best so far were the Merril Ultras....Combine that with Rotta pins and off you go...TM



Post Reply