Physics debate

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Physics debate

Post by Stephen » Wed Jan 11, 2023 5:28 pm

GrimSurfer wrote:
Mon Dec 12, 2022 6:26 pm
Lots of rabbit holes to be sure. And I agree that some of them aren’t worth going down. But Einstein once said that it’s important to think simply… but not too simply.
He also said:
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Albert Einstein
I think 36 pages qualifies as “Over and over.”

I’m becoming concerned that some folks I look up to and respect haven’t figure out the pattern yet!
:lol:

User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Physics debate

Post by Stephen » Wed Jan 11, 2023 5:31 pm

There is a repeating pattern here…



User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Physics debate

Post by Stephen » Wed Jan 11, 2023 5:39 pm

E733EC54-26A0-41FC-84DC-662052B5E23A.gif



User avatar
GrimSurfer
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:56 am
Ski style: Nordic Backcountry
Favorite Skis: Yes
Favorite boots: Uh huh

Re: Physics debate

Post by GrimSurfer » Wed Jan 11, 2023 5:59 pm

Inspiredcapers wrote:
Wed Jan 11, 2023 5:17 pm
This thread has me kinda starting to believe in perpetual motion…

I’d be thrilled if that snow dump eastern Canada decided to go west.
It may not materialize all that much here. The forecast is following the typical pattern… newsworthy announcement to softening forecast (it has gone from 30-40 cm to 25-30 in the latest update). Not a good trend… and very unusual for this time of year.
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.



User avatar
lowangle al
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
Favorite Skis: powder skis
Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.

Re: Physics debate

Post by lowangle al » Wed Jan 11, 2023 6:00 pm

Stephen wrote:
Wed Jan 11, 2023 5:28 pm
GrimSurfer wrote:
Mon Dec 12, 2022 6:26 pm
Lots of rabbit holes to be sure. And I agree that some of them aren’t worth going down. But Einstein once said that it’s important to think simply… but not too simply.
He also said:
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Albert Einstein
I think 36 pages qualifies as “Over and over.”

I’m becoming concerned that some folks I look up to and respect haven’t figure out the pattern yet!
:lol:
I saw the pattern about three cycles ago, but I figure it should be the guy that's wrong to STFU first. :D



User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Physics debate

Post by Stephen » Wed Jan 11, 2023 6:23 pm

@lowangle al, good luck on that one!
Let me know how it goes.
:twisted:



User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Physics debate

Post by Stephen » Wed Jan 11, 2023 6:25 pm

Any moment, I’m expecting this…
.
5E09D4F5-21EF-4699-8554-78A289891DC9.jpeg



User avatar
lowangle al
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
Favorite Skis: powder skis
Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.

Re: Physics debate

Post by lowangle al » Wed Jan 11, 2023 6:30 pm

I thought it might be a test from the Knights.

This thread should have been in the OT forum. Maybe someone can write a letter to the administrator and ask him to move it.



User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Physics debate

Post by Stephen » Wed Jan 11, 2023 6:50 pm

64BF9C74-EEA7-49F8-AC29-3D459FDA1B56.png



User avatar
wabene
Posts: 716
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:53 am
Location: Duluth Minnesota
Ski style: Stiff kneed and wide eyed.
Favorite Skis: Åsnes Gamme, Fischer SB98, Mashus M50, M78, Pano M62
Favorite boots: Crispi Svartsen 75mm, Scarpa T4
Occupation: Carpenter

Re: Physics debate

Post by wabene » Wed Jan 11, 2023 9:23 pm

What I miss?

f45683decd05036e57a286b4b9bdc516.jpg



Post Reply