Objective waxables, anyone?
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:44 am
First, I want to say how much I appreciate all the excellent reviews and opinions I've read here this year... since I left the (xc/bc/tele) sales and tech world several years ago, I haven't really looked at what's around. As we speak, I'm on the verge of pushing the button for either the Annum, Kom 162, or the Objective's (these are calling).
My main question is whether anyone's been skiing the waxed model? I've only read about the BC, which I was leaning towards- but I just came across some taxable Objective's for an unheard of "low" price. Having skied waxables for 40 years or so, there's no problem with waxing ( until of course it's upwards of freezing, and not yet morphed for klister). And I know it's the same ski as the BC, but for the base. Just curious, if you've skied 'em, if there's anything particular to note about the waxable version. They'd be for skiing typical Northern VT (think: a few miles from Jay Peak) terrain and conditions. Thinking the taxables and kicker skins may be an even more versatile option than the BC's.
Thoughts?
My main question is whether anyone's been skiing the waxed model? I've only read about the BC, which I was leaning towards- but I just came across some taxable Objective's for an unheard of "low" price. Having skied waxables for 40 years or so, there's no problem with waxing ( until of course it's upwards of freezing, and not yet morphed for klister). And I know it's the same ski as the BC, but for the base. Just curious, if you've skied 'em, if there's anything particular to note about the waxable version. They'd be for skiing typical Northern VT (think: a few miles from Jay Peak) terrain and conditions. Thinking the taxables and kicker skins may be an even more versatile option than the BC's.
Thoughts?