Dumb wax question
- ddg
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 1:56 pm
- Location: Bloomfield Kings NB Canada
- Occupation: Software developer
Dumb wax question
Anyone tried grip was on waxless skis? Just to provide an extra bit of grip for some skis/conditions.
Derrick
- bgregoire
- Posts: 1511
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
- Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
- Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
- Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar
Re: Dumb wax question
Yup. Its a good idea if you are slipping, but on the tip and tail only though. No grip wax of the scales!ddg wrote:Anyone tried grip was on waxless skis? Just to provide an extra bit of grip for some skis/conditions.
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4202
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: Dumb wax question
Yes- for me- on the tip only- up to 8" or so ahead of the waxless traction pocket. Your weight transfer is forwards, on the "kick" phase (i.e. more like kicking a soccer ball, than kicking backwards). Your weight is full on the heel, in the "glide" phase. If you put grip wax behind the traction pocket- it will gradually smear it onto the glide zone of your tail. I hot wax the glide zones of my tips/tails. If the snow conditions are very slippery- I don't mind extending grip wax ahead of the traction pocket- unlike on the tail- the grip wax will stay where you want it..
Not a dumb question at all- and rarely, rarely discussed. Waxless skis "don't need to be waxed"- right?
Not a dumb question at all- and rarely, rarely discussed. Waxless skis "don't need to be waxed"- right?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Re: Dumb wax question
Uh-er.....Sometimes and lightly, wax will be applied to the "Bones"....Old bones need help and wax will fix them....Wanna work as little as possible on the up....TM
- CIMA
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:01 pm
- Location: Japan
- Ski style: NNN-BC
- Favorite Skis: Rossignol XP100
- Favorite boots: Fischer BC GT
- Occupation: Retired
Re: Dumb wax question
How about using kicker skins instead if you need extra grip?
I have been doing that.
I have been doing that.
The flowing river never stops and yet the water never stays the same.
- ddg
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 1:56 pm
- Location: Bloomfield Kings NB Canada
- Occupation: Software developer
Re: Dumb wax question
Why not on the scales? Because of this?...bgregoire wrote: ...but on the tip and tail only though. No grip wax of the scales!
Why not a very light coating on the front half/quater of the scales?lilcliffy wrote:If you put grip wax behind the traction pocket- it will gradually smear it onto the glide zone of your tail.
Derrick
Re: Dumb wax question
Knee bone is connected to the....anyway waxing the "bone" pocket...is the double camber pocket...which breaks away on the down ....so no problem.....Wouldn't do that if you get new zillion dollar skis but for old beaters like we ski.....CIMA depends on everything but we like the lightness of ski unobstructed....even shuffling and sliding up works better with less resistance...(oldies need all the help we can get!)....TM
- ddg
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 1:56 pm
- Location: Bloomfield Kings NB Canada
- Occupation: Software developer
Re: Dumb wax question
Related question... What is a decent set of glide waxes for waxless skis? Is the "SWIX FLUORINATED GLIDE WAX" in violet, red, blue a good choice. I'm looking for a low hassle procedure. What do you do between waxes - just give a good brush with a fine nylon brush? Or is something cheaper like this just as good.
Derrick
Re: Dumb wax question
IF you are looking for a low-hassle glide wax, you might like a paste wax like from FastWax: http://www.skifastwax.com/alpine-ski-wa ... 0-blue-60g
It ain't cheap, but a tin lasts me a couple seasons and it works great and is quite durable IME. Rub it in, cork it smooth, and brush with brass and/or nylon brush.
It ain't cheap, but a tin lasts me a couple seasons and it works great and is quite durable IME. Rub it in, cork it smooth, and brush with brass and/or nylon brush.
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4202
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: Dumb wax question
Grip wax needs to be polished or "corked" into the base in order for it to for the wax to adhere to it. There is no way to polish the wax into the traction scales- the grip wax will quickly rub off on the snow- a waste of time.ddg wrote:Why not on the scales? Because of this?...bgregoire wrote: ...but on the tip and tail only though. No grip wax of the scales!
Why not a very light coating on the front half/quater of the scales?lilcliffy wrote:If you put grip wax behind the traction pocket- it will gradually smear it onto the glide zone of your tail.
The grip wax will also fill in the grooves or "valleys" in the traction scales- reducing their effectiveness.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.