Meidjos on Altai Koms
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:51 am
Has anyone tried this combination? Are there any reasons why it wouldn’t work? I’m tempted by the shortest size, which I believe are 150 cm, as these would be the easiest to carry on a rucksack but I guess that there would be disadvantages to skiing something so short. Would any such disadvantages be a deal breaker in your opinion?
Some back story: I appreciate that it’s a bit arse about face to start with the bindings but I have a pair of Meidjo 2.1s that haven’t seen the light of day for several years and it seems a shame not to use them. Currently, they are mounted on a pair of Sky7 HDs, that I find too wide underfoot for my normal use in Alpine resorts , or my local indoor real artificial snow centre, Manchester’s Chillfactore.
I live in the Derbyshire Peak District, where I am lucky, by English standards, to enjoy, on average, about ten days a year of local skiing. Mostly, these are enjoyed on Nordic touring skis, for, despite the name, most Peak District hills have flat or rolling tops and the snow sticks higher up. The sides of the hills, however, can be steeper and offer some excitement and desperate manoeuvres in variable but usually shallow snow. A short, ultra manoeuvrable ski appeals for such conditions, especially if it has up hill and cross country abilities as well. Also, I have room for a ski to use in the west of the island of Britain where the mountains tend to be steep and rocky.Here skiing involves long carries, hard snow and the urgent avoidance of obstacles.
Overall, therefore, easy carrying and manoeuvrability are more important than speed or float and, on my small local hills, a patterned base would make skiing laps much more fun than swapping to skins or boot packing. On a practical note, I’ve found a European supplier of Koms, so would they work for me and how long, or short, should I try them?
Some back story: I appreciate that it’s a bit arse about face to start with the bindings but I have a pair of Meidjo 2.1s that haven’t seen the light of day for several years and it seems a shame not to use them. Currently, they are mounted on a pair of Sky7 HDs, that I find too wide underfoot for my normal use in Alpine resorts , or my local indoor real artificial snow centre, Manchester’s Chillfactore.
I live in the Derbyshire Peak District, where I am lucky, by English standards, to enjoy, on average, about ten days a year of local skiing. Mostly, these are enjoyed on Nordic touring skis, for, despite the name, most Peak District hills have flat or rolling tops and the snow sticks higher up. The sides of the hills, however, can be steeper and offer some excitement and desperate manoeuvres in variable but usually shallow snow. A short, ultra manoeuvrable ski appeals for such conditions, especially if it has up hill and cross country abilities as well. Also, I have room for a ski to use in the west of the island of Britain where the mountains tend to be steep and rocky.Here skiing involves long carries, hard snow and the urgent avoidance of obstacles.
Overall, therefore, easy carrying and manoeuvrability are more important than speed or float and, on my small local hills, a patterned base would make skiing laps much more fun than swapping to skins or boot packing. On a practical note, I’ve found a European supplier of Koms, so would they work for me and how long, or short, should I try them?