Fischer BCX vs Lundhags Abisku
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2024 11:29 am
My stiffer boot thread has brought me down to the Lundhags Abisku and the Fischer BCX Traverse. I'd be getting them for the Xplore binding but it wouldn't surprise me if the fit was the same for NNNBC and 3-Pin (Fischer Transnordic). Hoping someone has insight into this comparison regarding sizing, weight, performance, build quality, etc.
I have heard that the Abisku has a wider fit and the Fischer is narrower which leans me towards the Abisku. But, the Abisku is harder to find and completely unavailable in North America. I do like the higher shaft on the Fischer as the intended use of this boot is xcD with Voile Objective and FT62 and I feel like that tall shaft with help with lateral support. In the end I'll go with the one that fits.
I'm not looking forward to playing the exchange game across an ocean. I'm sure it'll go fine, I just hate to pay shipping across the pond so, I want my first shot to have a pretty high probability of success.
I have heard that the Abisku has a wider fit and the Fischer is narrower which leans me towards the Abisku. But, the Abisku is harder to find and completely unavailable in North America. I do like the higher shaft on the Fischer as the intended use of this boot is xcD with Voile Objective and FT62 and I feel like that tall shaft with help with lateral support. In the end I'll go with the one that fits.
I'm not looking forward to playing the exchange game across an ocean. I'm sure it'll go fine, I just hate to pay shipping across the pond so, I want my first shot to have a pretty high probability of success.