connyro wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:58 am
fark_qyhKj_4DuJJgAFo7uGWj_2roA3I.png
I love the last paragraph. Got to admire and welcome their sisu
fark_EaKxguyRA38UCwLnXn3j-XSkVOQ.gif
"Since we are now a member of Nato, we have a very important task. The task is to give to you for the deposit our ratification of Swedish membership. This is our first act as a member state," [Finnish Foreign Minister Pekka] Haavisto said.
https://yle.fi/a/74-20025750/64-3-146900
I.e., Finland's first act in NATO is their approval of Sweden joining. Seem fairly
pro forma to me.
It's a pragmatic formality, removing themselves as a barrier as their joining 'de facto' raises the requisite number of NATO-member approvals for Sweden from 30 to 31, with 28 becoming 29 approving, with Hungary and Turkey remaining -- Sweden's remaining approvals needed briefly went from 2 to 3, then back to 2. Had Finland and Sweden entered concurrently, only 30 would have been needed and then 32 for the next NATO applicant.
Aside from the 12 founding members, the largest group to join was seven (7) in 2004: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia.
Had those seven entered in succession versus concurrently (
2004 March 29, 1:00pm local),
a diplomatic dilemma could have occurred as in theory any could have blocked any remaining once they themselves were in, even if just minutes or seconds old, to those figuratively standing in line behind them.
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52044.htm
Likewise if Finland didn't promptly approve Sweden (or set the process in motion), a diplomatic row could have ensued. What would be interesting to know is how Finland's parliament and president pre-approved Sweden without yet being a member themselves. Perhaps a bill with a "if... then..." immediate trigger clause was used, though I could find no info regarding such.
Regardless, as the countries effectively applied together, I look at the approval as Finland entering the cafe first, but holding the door open behind them expecting Sweden to be right on their heels. No doubt given Nordic area relations, I would think Sweden would have done the same had Finland's approval been delayed.
Now if were about which country is better in hockey ...
---
