Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: Ski Review: 2018-2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
Yeah, Stephen! Good choice.
- Musk Ox
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:53 am
- Location: North
- Ski style: Bad
- Favorite Skis: I am a circumpolar mammal
- Favorite boots: Hooves
- Occupation: Eating lichen, walking about
Re: Ski Review: 2018-2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
They're really good, aren't they?
I sold my Mountain Races to buy a pair a pair of Gammes and I've not been in a situation yet where I regretted it. They're much better in deep snow and on descents.
I sold my Mountain Races to buy a pair a pair of Gammes and I've not been in a situation yet where I regretted it. They're much better in deep snow and on descents.
- Stephen
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
- Location: PNW USA
- Ski style: Aspirational
- Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
- Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
- Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo
Re: Ski Review: 2018-2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
@Musk Ox The MR48 was great in the track and carried over onto trails nicely, but I had the sense I wasn’t going to use them enough to justify, and am, so far, very happy with the adjustment to my ski selection (AKA, quiver — I’m not much for jargon).
Latest “adjustment” is trade FT62 188 for Objective 178 with NNN BC.
More to follow...
Latest “adjustment” is trade FT62 188 for Objective 178 with NNN BC.
More to follow...
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4156
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
@Stephen
Wicked.
Beautiful photos man.
Amazing ski.
I have put an insane number of miles and hills on this ski this winter.
Gareth
Wicked.
Beautiful photos man.
Amazing ski.
I have put an insane number of miles and hills on this ski this winter.
Gareth
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
- Hunttr
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:20 pm
- Location: Rhode Island, U.S.
- Ski style: Classic
- Favorite Skis: Gamme 54
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska
- Occupation: Retired Firefighter, Carpenter, Fisherman
Re: Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
As far as my weight goes for the Gamme 54 I'm curious if anyone has any insight.6'2" and 215 lbs. I believe the chart states >190 lbs-->210 cm.I have a feeling I may be a little heavy for these skis according to what I have read regarding other peoples wt vs size.Fisheater says he can easily squash the 210s with all weight on one foot and he weighs 195 lbs.They may very from ski to ski but unfortunately their are no dealers close to me here in RI for me to properly size.Thanks for any input.
- riel
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:31 pm
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: BC XC
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Gamme, Ingstad & Støretind, Fischer Mountain Cross & E99
- Favorite boots: Fischer BCX675
- Website: https://surriel.com/
- Contact:
Re: Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
I weigh about the same, and skied 12 miles on Wooderson's 210cm long Gammes a few weeks ago.Hunttr wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:13 pmAs far as my weight goes for the Gamme 54 I'm curious if anyone has any insight.6'2" and 215 lbs. I believe the chart states >190 lbs-->210 cm.I have a feeling I may be a little heavy for these skis according to what I have read regarding other peoples wt vs size.Fisheater says he can easily squash the 210s with all weight on one foot and he weighs 195 lbs.They may very from ski to ski but unfortunately their are no dealers close to me here in RI for me to properly size.Thanks for any input.
They are the best skis I have ever used. They glide fast, even uphill, are super stable, and fairly easy to initiate turns with. Oh, I was wearing a pack as well, so definitely heavier than your 215 lbs that day
- Hunttr
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:20 pm
- Location: Rhode Island, U.S.
- Ski style: Classic
- Favorite Skis: Gamme 54
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska
- Occupation: Retired Firefighter, Carpenter, Fisherman
Re: Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
Thanks Riel, that is very helpfull.!
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4156
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
To clarify- Fisheater can squash the 210cm Gamme 54 with both feet equally weighted- as can I at ~180+lbs (i.e. depending on pack wieght).Hunttr wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:13 pmAs far as my weight goes for the Gamme 54 I'm curious if anyone has any insight.6'2" and 215 lbs. I believe the chart states >190 lbs-->210 cm.I have a feeling I may be a little heavy for these skis according to what I have read regarding other peoples wt vs size.Fisheater says he can easily squash the 210s with all weight on one foot and he weighs 195 lbs.They may very from ski to ski but unfortunately their are no dealers close to me here in RI for me to properly size.Thanks for any input.
From my perspective one doesn't want a backcountry Nordic ski with a TRULY effective wax pocket.
Classic XC TRACK skis have a TRULY effective wax pocket such that the camber in the kick zone must be fully (even forcefully in some cases) weighted to engage the traction zone.- this would be TERRIBLE in deep snow and steep slopes.
The Gamme 54 does have an "effective" wax pocket in that the traction zone/wax pocket/kicker skin does release from the snow as you stride forwards.
If the 210cm Gamme 54 camber was not squashed when I stand on it evenly- I would not be able to use it in the backcountry and would need a shorter length.
Hope I am being helful here!
Are you concerned that- at your weight- the 210cm will not offer an effective "wax pocket" or are you concerned about other things- for example flotation?
Gareth
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4156
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
@Hunttr Riel's testing of the 210cm Gamme 54 should be particularly relevant for you as you are both of a similar weight.
I know that Woodserson has had some issues in steep terrain with the 210cm Gamme 54- but Woods WEIGHS a lot less than you or Riel. I am in between.
The real question in my mind is whether Asnes shouldn't be making distance-oriented skis like the Gamme/Amundsen in even longer lengths than 210cm...
If a 210cm Gamme is perfect for me at ~180+lbs- then I would think that skiers that are 210+lbs would do better on a 220cm Gamme...
I know that Woodserson has had some issues in steep terrain with the 210cm Gamme 54- but Woods WEIGHS a lot less than you or Riel. I am in between.
The real question in my mind is whether Asnes shouldn't be making distance-oriented skis like the Gamme/Amundsen in even longer lengths than 210cm...
If a 210cm Gamme is perfect for me at ~180+lbs- then I would think that skiers that are 210+lbs would do better on a 220cm Gamme...
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
- Olaf
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:21 pm
- Location: Washington State
- Ski style: Backyard touring on untracked snow
- Favorite Skis: Rossignol Touring LST BC AR, Atomic Rainier, Rossignol Soul 7
- Favorite boots: Rossignol X5 NNN, Scarpa T3, Atomic Hawk Prime 120
- Occupation: Mechanical Engineer
Re: Ski Review: 2019 Åsnes Gamme 54 BC
Has anyone skied the Gamme 54 with 3 pin bindings and leather Snowfield class boots? What were your impression on this combination?