On the Left, 2016 Sbound 98 @ 179/Voile 3p/Alfa Greenland Boot, 2415 grams per foot
On the Right, 2021 Sbound 98 @ 179/Xplore/Alfa Free A/P/S Boot, 2113 grams per foot
302 grams lighter per foot (10.65 oz)
Lets see if these babies can dance.

Thanks for posting your experience! Did you find that the Alfa Free had way better kick and glide and flexibility (on flats and small grades) than the Fischer Transnordic? Or was it similar?brwilkinson wrote: ↑Mon Dec 27, 2021 8:24 pmSo I am a week or so into my 2022 season, skiing every day, plus a few singles in the weekends prior.
My setup:
Sbound 98, 3 pin + Fischer Transnordic.
Sbound 112, Xplore + Alfa free.
The Transnordics are pretty great,.. Very comfortable and if you ever tried the old model, these are improved in my opinion. The extra height was very welcome, plus the lace system is improved. I didn't face any issues with ankle flexibility for kick and glide at all. They had a very short wear in time.
That's "the" interesting question for sure
At first I wasn't sure what to think about these boots, as my obvious current point of reference is skiing the Greenland 75. My head keeps going back to an old pair of Merrell welted leather boots that I skied for a couple decades before they blew apart. None of the long list of the modern 75 leather boots that I have owned and worn out since those amazing boots have hit the sweet spot as far as touring and downhill control. Of course, it might just be an old man's nostalgia kicking in. The succeeding leathers were OK, but the tele crowd had moved on to plastic and that led me to the Scarpa T4's, and eventually the T2's. I suffered through 2 generations of T4's (I could never solve the blister problem) before I swore them off for good. As amazing as the T4's are, they are heavy and not the ideal boot to tour in.lilcliffy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:52 pmJust wondering what you think about the comparison between your Greenland 75 vs the Free Xplore...
I am thinking that the two boots are so different in their support and stability for downhill skiing that it might be hard to compare NN-3pin vs Xplore on your 98s?
I don't own the Guard Adv so I can't give a direct size comparison. I do wear the Alfa Skarvet and the Alfa Greenland in size 42. I ordered the Free's in size 43 and had them shipped from Alfa in Norway. On Alfa's website, they describe the Free fit as "regular" and the Guard Adv and Skarvet as "wide" so the Free uses a different last. My other concern was that the boot might not be as warm as leathers (based on some comments from others who were early testers), so I planned to wear a heavy wool sock and a liner with the Frees. I only wear a single midweight sock in my other Alfa boots. It was a hard decision and in the end I sized up to a 43. So far I have not had any issues with cold feet, but the coldest I've skied them is at 12 F (-11 C), so that is hardly a test. The toe bend crease is much further forward on the Free's than on my other Alfa boots. I tried to show that in the first look video on my YouTube channel, and I will take a closer look at it again in in my review video. Sometimes I can feel the top of the boot touching the top of my toes in the kick and glide motion and that has me concerned a bit. Toe pinch is a real issue for me with 75 mm leathers, but the mechanics of the Xplore system seems to make that less of an issue. My toes have more curl than a normal foot so this may not be an issue for most people. If there is any toe pinch in the telemark position, it hasn't caused me any pain so far, but I will try to focus on that issue in my next outing. I haven't had any blisters and I'm trying to listen to what my feet are telling me much more than I normally would. I have buggered my feet so many times in the past on new boots and I am currently taping my heels in these boots as a precaution. I sure wish I would have had the opportunity to try on both the 42's and 43's in a store before purchase so I didn't have to second guess on sizing. I'm sure I can make these work for me, but I will always wonder how the 42's would have fit. I know the siren call is strong on this system, but one thing to keep in mind is that there is a risk in being an early adopter, and only time will tell if there are any weakness in the design that will show up as we put in more miles. I hope that others who have bought the boot will chime in on their fit experience.