Elan Ripstick mounting point question...

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Elan Ripstick mounting point question...

Post by Stephen » Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:04 pm

If there is science to "Telemark bindings should be further back than Alpine boot center" then mounting telemark at "Factory Recommended Boot Center" should produce a ski that skis more "Progressive" and is easier to turn.
A downside would be that the ski is more likely to "tip dive" in deeper powder.

It seems like most of the comments I hear about "mount back" are somewhat subjective, along the lines of "It feels better."

There can't really be a right or wrong here -- just different ski feel, and personal preference.

I haven't been willing to experiment. As Woodserson said:
only go screwing with things if you like experimenting and are ok with the agony of defeat (I have definitely mounted several skis too far back and had to go back and drill a bunch of new holes!)

User avatar
Knuckle-Dragger
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 2:58 pm
Location: USA - PNW
Ski style: silly walk
Favorite Skis: K2 Backlash 181
Favorite boots: Unbuckled Garmont Syner-G

Re: Elan Ripstick mounting point question...

Post by Knuckle-Dragger » Wed Feb 07, 2024 5:38 pm

I think I found the best way to determine where to mount.
Image
Last edited by Knuckle-Dragger on Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:33 am, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
Montana St Alum
Posts: 1203
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:42 pm
Location: Wasatch, Utah
Ski style: Old dog, new school
Favorite Skis: Blizzard Rustler 9/10
Favorite boots: Tx Pro
Occupation: Retired, unemployable

Re: Elan Ripstick mounting point question...

Post by Montana St Alum » Thu Feb 08, 2024 7:41 am

Knuckle-Dragger wrote:
Wed Feb 07, 2024 5:38 pm
I think I found the best way to determine where to mount.
Image
Hah, probably as good as any approach, but I'm in Utah and I'm afraid I'll go to Heck if I use one.



User avatar
lowangle al
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
Favorite Skis: powder skis
Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.

Re: Elan Ripstick mounting point question...

Post by lowangle al » Thu Feb 08, 2024 9:31 am

Stephen wrote:
Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:04 pm
If there is science to "Telemark bindings should be further back than Alpine boot center" then mounting telemark at "Factory Recommended Boot Center" should produce a ski that skis more "Progressive" and is easier to turn.
A downside would be that the ski is more likely to "tip dive" in deeper powder.

It seems like most of the comments I hear about "mount back" are somewhat subjective, along the lines of "It feels better."

There can't really be a right or wrong here -- just different ski feel, and personal preference.

I haven't been willing to experiment. As Woodserson said:
only go screwing with things if you like experimenting and are ok with the agony of defeat (I have definitely mounted several skis too far back and had to go back and drill a bunch of new holes!)
I don't know if there is a science to it. I always thought it was a holdover from mounting traditional Nordic skis, but there are probably a lot of people that mount back that never skied traditional Nordic skis. It would help with tip dive though so that may be a reason. I prefer to manage tip dive with body position and properly pressuring my skis. The more active your bindings the harder this will be.



Post Reply