This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
The profile and flex are very similar to the S-112 and only slightly wider than the Annum/Guide. All three of them have the same waist. They are all single cambered, with at least a slightly rockered tip (The Stinger may have more rocker in the tip).
The Stinger has a wider tail, giving it a true parabolic profile- enabling the shorter turning radius. This makes the biggest difference on a dense base- when the ski is carving.
The profile of the Stinger would make it squirrelly as a xcountry ski- there is no way it is going to track like a Guide/Annum when K&G touring.
That seems like a very big price to me- especially compared to the Annum. I suppose the Stinger is strong enough to put AT bindings on it....oooooh!
If I was going to spend that kind of money I would definitely go for the Vector BC.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.