This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
phoenix wrote: K2 always recommended pin line on chord center for their tele's. And they all skied (and ski) perfectly for me. However... all my experience has been skiing pre-rockered skis.
Back when there existed skis labeled "tele." I also believe none of those had rocker. The rocker makes a big impact on how skis behave, and on mounting locations.
I saw something about a "progressive tele mount" in some shop manual, maybe the BD ones. I think it amounted to moving the boot back a couple cm from the alpine mount location, which would still be well forward of a pin line on chord center mount. Seems kind of silly, but maybe it works.... I've never tried it.
EDIT: I had that wrong. Progressive tele mount per BD = putting tele boot center on alpine boot center mark. "Classic mount" = tele boot center 25mm back from alpine boot center mark. Still makes a bit more sense than pin line on chord center since it takes into account boot size.
Well the skis are on the way. I have the bindings and will get the t4s soon. I will mock mount them to all the recommendations to see how they line up but will probably lean to the manufactures recondmendation of BC on mark.
I plan to use my Alico double leathers to ski as well ( there goes all that precise measurement)