"Go short - Telemark stance is far longer than a normal alpine stance"
"Go long - longer skis give much better directional stability"
"Go Soft - you can't flex the skis as well. You'll get tired quickly with stiff skis"
"Go stiff - you'll be able to flex way more than alpine"
As you see I got really confused. From my personal experience I ski less aggressively on tele, partly because I'm not as good as tele as I'm on alpine and partly because I get tired much quicker on tele (though the two points may be interlinked - perhaps the reason I get tired quicker is that I'm not as good and am not telemarking efficiently).
I'm hoping to get a new pair of all mountain tele skis and wonder if anyone could give me some recommendations.
My understanding is that not all skis can have tele bindings mounted. Black-crow skis for one can’t. https://www.black-crows.com/na/us_en/warranty/ Their warranty doesn’t cover “Damage to Freebird skis from using telemark bindings (as the ski construction is not designed to withstand the levels of torsion resulting from the leverage created by telemark bindings on the ski).
So Blackcrow is out. Head Kore has some really good reviews but seems a bit stiff. Besides the lack of metal in the core makes me wonder if I could mount tele bindings on them.
I'm down to enforcer 93 and mantra m5. I have tried both at various times (although both on alpine binding). I don't really like enforcer too much as i feel there were some chatters at high speed. I really like the mantra. The problem is that they are quite stiff so not sure how that will translate to telemark. Enforcer is noticeable softer so could perhaps tele better??
Open to other skis recommendation of course.
A separate question: what length should I get? Should I get longer or shorter than Alpine? I skied 185cm/184cm on enforcer 93 and m5. I'm 183cm and 75kg.
Some stats:
Advanced skier
Intermediate telemarker (been only doing it for about 10 weeks)
Currently doing tele on Brahma but bindings got ripped off. Skis are beyond repair.
Thanks
