Jurassien wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 10:19 am
In the EU there is an industrial standard, BS EN 204, for non-structural wood glues. The glues are rated in 4 categories from D1 to D4, where D1 is mildly moisture resistant and D4 is weatherproof:
D3 = Interior areas, with frequent short-term exposure to running or condensed water and/or heavy exposure to high humidity. Exterior areas not exposed to weather
D4 = Interior areas with frequent long-term exposure to running or condensed water.
Exterior areas exposed to weather
I don’t know if this standard is recognised in the USA or elsewhere, but if so, then any D4-rated wood glue should be appropriate for ski binding montage.
Cascol, as recommended by Åsnes, is rated D4 – but so are several non-PU glues. I think Åsnes are doing their customers a disservice by not explaining why a PU glue should be superior, or more desirable, in their skis than any other D4-rated glue. They refer to “regular white wood glue” rather than referring to the industrial standard.
Quote from Åsnes:
THE BASIS FOR OUR RECOMMENDATION
Extensive testing, traditions and long experience gained from all the skis we have provided for expeditions, harsh mountain environments, and military NATO Forces prove that PU-adhesives work much better than ordinary glue made for wood. PU adhesives have been found to have on average 20% better properties related to the holding of the screws in the ski and in strength. Since PU adhesives also cure in contact with moisture, it has actually been shown that the strength and hold can be even stronger if the adhesives are lightly sprayed with water before mounting of the bindings. This can also be done with a moist cloth to be sure one does not use excessive glue and to avoid too much moisture.
Most importantly, the PU adhesive has better properties than regular white wood glue to seal the screw holes, because the PU-glue expands and has a more flexible and water-resistant composition.
I’ve been told (= I don’t know) that PU glues have a short shelf-life once opened – so you would use a very small amount for your skis and, if you didn’t need the stuff for anything else, you’d be taking the rest to Hazardous Disposal in a year’s time. Perhaps someone who knows better can comment on this.
Great post. The Europeans have always been ahead on standards… starting with the British Standard (BS) in the early part of the 20th Century and moving to EN (European Norm), German DIN etc.
I’m inclined to agree with Asnes on this one. PUs seem to do everything needed. They expand to fill voids, they harden up very well, and they are impervious to water when hardened.
Wood glues are great for carpentry. They take their time to bond (which assists in positioning), absorb into wood (bond well) and are water soluble/non marring. They also shrink over time, which isn’t very good.
Epoxies have other properties, like fast curing, water resistance, and heat resistance. Some even resist oil and solvents, which PU and wood glues either don’t do at all or do t do very well.
I can say from experience that PU glue doesn’t store well. Left uncapped, it turns into a big foam ball in the presence of any moisture. It doesn’t tolerate freezing very well until it cures. It doesn’t expand or harden properly when left to cure in the cold. It’s messy AF, which explains the permanent stains on almost all of my trousers.
I think the reason why manufacturers don’t explain a lot of this stuff is because people don’t want to take the time to read/understand. They’d use a glue stick (collagen) if it suited them and wouldn’t want to spend the money on something better.
Companies like Asnes cater to a higher crowd. While I don’t ski Asnes, I do appreciate their attention to detail, as do their users.
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.